John McCain Explains The Evidence For Global Warming

“Some of the most compelling evidence of global warming comes to us from NASA”

McCain’s Speech on Climate Change – New York Times

Very true. NASA data tampering has doubled 1890-1980 warming since 1981.


About Tony Heller

Just having fun
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

15 Responses to John McCain Explains The Evidence For Global Warming

  1. gator69 says:

    “Some of the most compelling evidence of ghosts comes to us from ghosthunters”


  2. au1corsair says:

    I never suspected that Hanoi was in Manchuria! I gotta learn map reading again!

    • Gail Combs says:

      That is why he was called the Manchurian candidate and why I refused to vote for him. It was the first time I ever voted third party.

  3. ren says:

    As I wrote cooler in the west US and Europe.
    Circulation along the yellow area.

  4. Jeffk says:

    If you look at graphs of past ages, the “hockey stick” was the norm. Only in recent centuries has climate been calmer, allowing human progress to develop and population growth to explode. We should welcome the return of the hockey stick to keep human parasites in check.
    To save the Earth from human parasites, why are Warmists warning us about “climate change” with science fiction doomsday press releases? Wouldn’t it be better for the planet in the long run if humans continued (allegedly) causing natural disasters, sea level rise, etc reducing human population like the Black Death in the Middle Ages? The Earth will survive and recover if those allegations are true.
    As a compromise, the two sides — Warmists and Deniers — should privately agree on global warming, but only if Warmists stop trying to warn everybody, and all climate funding and green energy subsidies are halted. The Earth will win in the end.
    Your thoughts?
    If Warmists refuse, then we’ll know their true motives are a one-world gov’t to develop and industrialize 3rd World as they have been since colonial times. And that’ll increase CO2 even more. It’s just about money and power, the redistribution wolf with a new mask.

  5. omanuel says:

    Thanks, Steven, for your ability to see and the courage to tell the public the “science” of Big Brother is like the “new suit” of imaginary cloth worn by the Emperor in Hans Christian Anderson’s classic children’s tale.

    John McCain is not to blame for believing that NASA tells the truth.

    • darrylb says:

      Omanuel—I know of no politician, actor or media person, who knows anything about the nature of the so called green house effect.
      Nor do the vast majority of scientists who postulate about it.
      Nor do they realize the necessary blessing that it is for life to exist on earth as we know it.
      I am very much in agreement those who say regarding the science of climate change that it is very much governed by unknowns and also unknown unknowns.
      The statement made by Scientific Institutions in the United States that……
      Is antithetical to the scientific process in general and more so to the science of climate change.
      A combination of egos, money, and the crystallization of the warnings of D. Eisenhower
      have made a mockery of the science.

      • gator69 says:

        The original draft of Ike’s famous speech also included a warning about government and media collusion, but his advisers convinced him to edit that part out. Ike should have listened to his gut, and ignored the circle of hand wringers.

    • DD More says:

      John McCain, his father and grandfather were all career US Navy officers. They worked and were raised on US Government and if your “is not to blame for believing that NASA” or any other part of the government to to be believed by us, then the only other option is –
      John McCain is too stupid for believing that NASA tells the truth.

  6. Eric Simpson says:

    John McCain is a nutcase.

Leave a Reply