Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Global Warming Makes It Cold
- Global Sea Ice Area
- Canada
- “we’ve lost control”
- “we’ve lost control”
- National Climate Assessment Math
- Net Zero Progress
- London Cancels Hanukkah
- Denying Scientific Principles (Part 2)
- Beam Me Up Scotty
- Denying Scientific Principles (Part 2)
- Captain Kirk Says CO2 Will Kill Us All Very Soon
- Irish Hate Crimes
- Burn Acreage Fraud In The 2023 National Climate Assessment
- CNN Wants Carbon Passports
- Burn Acreage Fraud In The 2023 National Climate Assessment
- Global Boiling Day 125
- Terrifying Proof Of Global Warming
- Popular Science : China’s Electricity To Be One Third Renewable By 2025
- “You can get people to say anything”
- Crashing The Climate
- Groups Who Endanger You
- “How did humans get to the brink of crashing climate?”
- “Preparing the world for a new Ice Age”
- Denying Scientific Principles
Email Subscription
Join 1,903 other subscribersRecent Comments
Morgan Wright on Captain Kirk Says CO2 Will Kil… saveenergy on Freezing Canada Morgan Wright on Freezing Canada saveenergy on Leon Heller’s Doctoral T… daveburton on Leon Heller’s Doctoral T… JapanT on “dozens of former intel… Morgan Wright on Fleeing Desperate Circumstance… Frank Stagg on 100% Wind By 2030 Eric Barnes on “dozens of former intel… Disillusioned on Censorship Industrial Complex
The Trend Is A “Clear, Consistent And Incontrovertible” Increase In A Few Fraudsters Ramping Up Their Lies About The Climate
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.
For seventy years (1945 – 2015), world leaders used federal research grant funds to guide government science toward the goals of UN’s Agenda 21.
This unethical practice was invisible until the goals of UN Agenda 21 were finally published in 1972.
If we are lucky Washington DC will get buried under five feet of ‘Global Warming’ next week as Buffalo NY did in November.
In order for the IPCC’s projections/a> to come true rate of temperature rise needs to dramatically accelerate. It’s not.
If you take the last 30 years of data from GISTEMP, You will find that from 1985 to 2000 the rate of temperature rise was 0.2 deg/decade and from 2000 to 2015 the rate has been .1 deg/decade. That works out to a negative acceleration of minus -0.01deg/decade².
Don’t worry Steve, Gavin is doing his best to accelerate the non-warming. !
http://woodfortrees.org/plot/hadcrut4gl/from:2013/plot/rss/from:2013/plot/hadcrut4gl/from:2013/trend/plot/rss/from:2013/trend/plot/uah/from:2013/plot/uah/from:2013/trend/plot/gistemp/from:2013/plot/gistemp/from:2013/trend
Well, the link works but it should have looked like this:
IPCC’s projections
It’s a pity the chart doesn’t include the lowest projection of all – the “commitment”, which assumed zero growth in greenhouse gasses. The most accurate projection so far.
If you would put the error bars (or grey area) you can show that the data are really so noisy that no conclusions can be drawn.
I can draw the conclusion that there isn’t any acceleration sufficient enough to result in the ridiculous IPCC projections. Click on my link
They should at least refer to them as tamperatures, not temperatures.