Arctic Warmed Six Degrees From 1900 To 1940

The Arctic warmed six degrees from 1900 to 1940, and the ice was the same thickness as today.

ScreenHunter_5293 Dec. 18 06.30

23 Feb 1940 – THE NORTH POLE. Is it Getting Warmer. | BUNDABER…

ScreenHunter_5296 Dec. 18 07.44

Papers Past — Auckland Star — 14 December 1940 — WARMER ARCTIC

Claims that Arctic warming are “unprecedented” are made by the same fraudsters who rewrite the past.


From: Tom Wigley <>
To: Phil Jones <>
Subject: 1940s
Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2009 23:25:38 -0600
Cc: Ben Santer <>

It would be good to remove at least part of the 1940s blip, but we are still left with “why the blip”.

About Tony Heller

Just having fun
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

21 Responses to Arctic Warmed Six Degrees From 1900 To 1940

  1. gator69 says:

    Well it was just a blip, not even weather. 😉

  2. Centinel2012 says:

    Reblogged this on Centinel2012 and commented:
    Once you start down the path of manipulating data there is no end to the process as you get deeper and deeper into the deceit, covering lie with lie until even the laiar doesn’t know what it true and what is fake.

  3. But, all the warming before 1970 was caused by the sun, and all the warming after 1970 was caused by CO2.

  4. Sleepalot says:

    Isn’t this a matter for the FBI? Misfeasance in public office, or something?

    • scizzorbill says:

      Asking the government to investigate/prosecute government sponsored fraud probably won’t happen.

      • Sleepalot says:

        … especially if they recieved no complaints.

        • Sleepalot says:

          … that’s how Gleik got away with wire – fraud – Heartland didn’t report it.

        • Gail Combs says:

          Sorry Sleepalot, Heartland did go after Gleick

          Heartland to release Gleick prosecution file – Watts Up With That?

          I found out the hard way that it doesn’t matter how good your evidence is. It does not matter if the police catch the criminal with your Freightliner in the guy’s front yard. If the guy has political pull the case will never ever see daylight. It will continually be put on the bottom of the heap and you will spend the entire day in court every month or so while the criminal is told to go home as soon as he shows. Finally after seven years of getting jerked around the case will become so stale the prosecutor will tell you they can not be bothered to schedule it again.

        • Gail Combs says:

          HMMMmm My first link croggled.

          “He is also a criminal, albeit one that avoided prosecution due to good political associations.”

          Why Isn’t Pacific Institute’s Peter Gleick in Jail?
          February 14, 2013 Joseph Bast

          The Heartland Institute today released a 57-page slide presentation produced by its legal counsel, Jones Day, titled “Criminal Referral of Dr. Peter H. Gleick Talking Points.” The report, presented to the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Northern District of Illinois, asked the government to prosecute Pacific Institute President Peter Gleick, a prominent climate scientist and environmental activist. Several presentations based on information contained in this document were made to the staff of the U.S. Attorney’s Office, including David Glockner, at the time head of the criminal division, and Gary Shapiro, now acting U.S. Attorney. So far, the government has not prosecuted Peter Gleick.

        • Sleepalot says:

          @ Gail. I sit corrrected. 🙂
          I think my point is still valid.

      • Sleepalot says:

        Otoh, Nixon lost his presidency over Watergate.

        • scizzorbill says:

          Let me make my statement clearer: Regardless of the complaints of government sponsored climate science fraud, an investigation/prosecution of said fraud by the same government probably won’t happen. I base my opinion on recent history. All the Obama government scandals have resulted in much lip flapping, and no action. Not one of the liars/criminals in the various branches of government have been punished in any way. Climate Astrologers have a government approved green light to make reality coincide with the agenda.

        • Maria Sanchez says:

          Nixon was a Republican. Huge difference.

  5. davidswuk says:

    If these people are living off or gaining from public funds then they should I think be indicted.

  6. davidswuk says:

    Back in mid 2010 I took some prints of the GISS ground temp charts that hardly supported the GW claim and some local swuk ones too out of interest and, lo & behold, tampered with too are their 2014 replacements I now see to the point of total omission of older records beyond meaningful adjustment.

Leave a Reply