1 Response to A Smart Student At Princeton

1. Russell C says:

   September 24, 2010 at 6:03 pm

   But wait, there’s more, on an angle of the subject that is less widely known than it otherwise should be: In my American Thinker article last week, “Warmist Slander of Scientific Skeptics” ( http://www.americanthinker.com…tific.html ), I detail how the sources in the recent New Yorker magazine ‘exposé’ of the Koch brothers rely on other sources for their global warming ‘corrupt scientists’ accusation that trace right back to enviro-activists who created the corruption accusation 15+ years ago.

   AGW believers have put all their eggs in one basket, that Fred Singer et. al were paid to “reposition global warming as theory rather than fact”, and as I boiled down in my ClimateRealists chronology article ( http://climaterealists.com/index.php?id=6175 ), these guys created a narrative so simple it could be regurgitated by the dumbest of AGW believers, in three points:

   1. a scientific consensus says the debate is settled; Fact, end of story.
   2. skeptic scientists corrupted by big coal & oil industries seek to ‘reposition’ the public into believing AGW is not a fact.
   3. journalists don’t have to give equal weight to skeptic scientists because of the previous two points; they’re corrupt, and few in number.

   NOBODY in the mainstream media checked the voracity of that accusation. If skeptic scientists are NOT corrupt, what fallback position do AGW believers have, when skeptic scientists and others are showing so many fatal faults in IPCC reports???

   Loading...

   Reply