Twitter / oakden_wolf: @ClimateDepot Keep quoting …
h/t to Marc Morano
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Recent Comments
saveenergy on Is Antarctica Melting? saveenergy on 65 Years Of Progress! Jeff L. on Analyzing The Western Water Cr… Morgan Wright on Great Lakes Approaching 100% I… Morgan Wright on Great Lakes Set Another Spring… gelcarrion0t on New Visitech Features saveenergy on Ice-Free Arctic By 2014 gelcarrion0t on Ice-Free Arctic By 2014 gelcarrion0t on Debt-Free US Treasury Forecast gelcarrion0t on Seventeen Years Of Fun
The Wolf who cried boy!
What does “paucity of support” have to do with science let alone anti-science, are we alluding to consensus again ?
How’s that “campaign” been working out ?
Steve: This is off-topic, but it seems Michael Mann is threatening to sue the National Review Online. Apparently, he didn’t like the fact that Mark Steyn called the Hockey-stick “fraudulant”:
http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/314680/get-lost-rich-lowry
That’ll be as effective as trying to sue Encyclopedia Dramatica.
I hope Mann sues NRO. He’ll get his ass kicked and his shoddy science will be exposed for the world to see.
NRO’s Headline in their reply:
AUGUST 22, 2012 1:15 P.M.
Get Lost
My response to Michael Mann.
By Rich Lowry
Well it sure looks like Rich Lowry is wearing his big-boy pants today, because he usually wears panties.
I believe it when I see it. If I was Mark Steyn I wouldn’t count on full support from National Review. They are not the same as when Buckley was around.
Having said that, Mark Steyn doesn’t need them anyway. He is fully capable of skinning Mann alive and maybe even crushing the rest of the entire AGW cabal in the process.
WUWT has the lawyers response to mannboys latest tantrum..its good:-)
So they’re allowed to call anybody anything they like, but they can’t take criticism?
Ya gotta go to NRO and read the lawyers’ response to Mann – priceless.
“Mann … is a public figure who would be required to prove by clear and convincing evidence that NRO published a provably false statement with actual malice”. … … “Dr. Mann could never meet such a daunting burden”.
Heh, heh, heh.
Sayonara, Mikey-san
“Paucity of support” – I think I’ll use big words to make myself sound smarter, even though I know nothing about climate science!
And how is Morano “anti-science”? What’s with all the shaming words? How exactly is skepticism anti-science?