This is silly. Heavy snowstorms didn’t happen until CO2 hit 350ppm.
This is silly. Heavy snowstorms didn’t happen until CO2 hit 350ppm.
| Jeff L. on Analyzing The Western Water Cr… | |
| Morgan Wright on Great Lakes Approaching 100% I… | |
| Morgan Wright on Great Lakes Set Another Spring… | |
| gelcarrion0t on New Visitech Features | |
| saveenergy on Ice-Free Arctic By 2014 | |
| gelcarrion0t on Ice-Free Arctic By 2014 | |
| gelcarrion0t on Debt-Free US Treasury Forecast | |
| gelcarrion0t on Seventeen Years Of Fun | |
| Barbara Stockwell on Nuclear Safety In The US | |
| saveenergy on 100% Tariffs On Chinese EV… |
Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Story should read 13 inches 🙁
A couple quick searches:
http://www.chicagoweathercenter.com/severe/chicago-snow/chibrknews-blizzard-of-2011-5th-snowiest-and-counting-20110202,0,7053742.story
http://www.crh.noaa.gov/lot/winter/chi_sno_hist.php
2nd link not updated to include first link, but shows 1931.
We almost broke the record this Groundhog Day, 13 feet seemed a bit deep 🙂
“Believe none of what you hear and half of what you see.”
Benjamin Franklin
Pshaw! Anything pre-satellite era is mythology.
13.7 feet (164.4 inches) of snow in 36 hours = 4.5 inches per hour. Holy lake effect Batman.
I wonder if Buffalo has got this record beat?
Poor Chile and Argentina as they suffer from both low and high CO2 snowfalls. Recent heavy snowfall has caused the closure of the Los Libertadores border crossing that connects Santiago, Chile to Mendoza, Argentina.
Steven,
Why did you delete my comment from yesterday, I only intended to alert you to an obviously wrong newspaper article.
There was no mocking, only some data.
I live in Chicago, i knew it was wrong.
PLEASE DELETE AFTER READING THIS, STEVEN.
FUCK, I HATE TO MAKE MISTAKES TOO.
BUT, NOW YOU GOT “BLADE” TO DEAL WITH.
MODS, DO NOT POST THIS !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
peace.
u.k.(us)
I didn’t delete anythng
u.k.(us) …
Dude it’s all good!
If an old newspaper article is incorrect, I doubt Steve is going to mod a post to remove it. It’s history, no sweat! Besides, we definitely don’t want people elsewhere to be purging ‘incorrect’ stuff from the archives, too Soviet, and imagaine if the AGW crowd could do this (oh wait, MWP, LIA, 1934 …).
I was just asking if Buffalo had it beat, only curious. There are lots of snow records around the Great Lakes as you probably know better than most people.
If I were you I would have just posted stuff to refute or correct the incorrect newspaper article. It is probably available over at Trove if you feel like searching.
No worries.
This blog is devoted to incorrect science news reporting. Why would I remove an article because it is incorrect?