Even Carl Rove and Bill O’Reilly say the content is protected, but the fact of the communication is not. That is a ridiculous and arbitrary distinction–if it is the law, it’s yet another incompetent, tyrannous law. And another reason not to blindly follow Rove or O’Reilly, or their like.
Reblogged this on Climate Ponderings.
Even Carl Rove and Bill O’Reilly say the content is protected, but the fact of the communication is not. That is a ridiculous and arbitrary distinction–if it is the law, it’s yet another incompetent, tyrannous law. And another reason not to blindly follow Rove or O’Reilly, or their like.
No, they are not spying on content, they are just storing it for a rainy day, in Utah.