“Actual science” is defined by models which have already failed miserably – like Hansen’s.


“Actual science” is defined by models which have already failed miserably – like Hansen’s.


| saveenergy on Cattle And The Climate | |
| gelcarrion0t on New Video : Analyzing Oil And… | |
| saveenergy on Is Antarctica Melting? | |
| saveenergy on 65 Years Of Progress! | |
| Jeff L. on Analyzing The Western Water Cr… | |
| Morgan Wright on Great Lakes Approaching 100% I… | |
| Morgan Wright on Great Lakes Set Another Spring… | |
| gelcarrion0t on New Visitech Features | |
| saveenergy on Ice-Free Arctic By 2014 | |
| gelcarrion0t on Ice-Free Arctic By 2014 |
Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

So I read the article and July’s “new evidence” for CAGW never came up oddly enough. Arguments, yes…and the regurgitated junk about extreme weather…but I don’t count that as new seeing as it’s been the main trumpet call since 2005 or so.
And the comments were pathetic…both the skeptics’ and the CAGW believers’ arguments had no weight whatsoever.
-Scott