Global Warming Doomsters’ Theories Wrong, Says NASA Study
Global warming proponents can catch up on the sleep they lost worrying about the planet getting hotter with each passing day. A NASA study which analyzes satellite data from the years 2000 through 2011, published in the peer-reviewed science journal Remote Sensing, reports that Earth’s atmosphere is allowing far more heat to be released into space than global warming proponents’ computer models have predicted.
The data also supports prior studies which suggested that increases in atmospheric carbon dioxide trap is far lesser heat than what have been claimed by the global warming doomsters.
The discrepancy between the model-based forecasts of rapid global warming and meteorological data showing a slower rate of warming has given rise to heated debates for more than two decades.
“The satellite observations suggest there is much more energy lost to space during and after warming than the climate models show,” Dr. Roy Spencer, study co-author and principal research scientist in the Earth System Science Center at The University of Alabama in Huntsville, said in a press release. “There is a huge discrepancy between the data and the forecasts that is especially big over the oceans.”
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Recent Comments
gelcarrion0t on New Video : Analyzing Oil And… saveenergy on Is Antarctica Melting? saveenergy on 65 Years Of Progress! Jeff L. on Analyzing The Western Water Cr… Morgan Wright on Great Lakes Approaching 100% I… Morgan Wright on Great Lakes Set Another Spring… gelcarrion0t on New Visitech Features saveenergy on Ice-Free Arctic By 2014 gelcarrion0t on Ice-Free Arctic By 2014 gelcarrion0t on Debt-Free US Treasury Forecast
The history behind this research paper is more important than the results of the paper as this paper is defending a prior paper and disputing claims made by Dressler ( The Aggie Joke) No I did not forget the “R”!
I almost dropped by his site earlier to see if he had created another of his pretzel logic posts on hard science. Probably still cursing and stamping his little cloven hooves. “Damn you Gavin, how could you let this happen?!” Is it possible to ad hominem attack a satellite?
argumentum ad спутник perhaps?
(that didn’t come out right)
It’s supposed to be “спутник” or the cyrillic for sputnik. *sigh*
Now, that’s the hallmark of settled science.
The best science politicians will buy!
Even the liberal Guardian paper is taking Think Progress and Joe Romm to task on his contrived conspiracy linking the Murdochs to Climategate.
‘The Murdochs had nothing to do with ‘Climategate’ email hacking’
-Attempts by Climate Progress to link the UEA email hacking to News Corp have little basis in fact, and make advocates of climate action look silly-
http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/the-lay-scientist/2011/jul/29/climategate-email-hacking-murdochs
We know he did not miss it – he refuses to acknowledge it since it was not “peer reviewed”. The peers being his cabal.
Bagdad Romm strikes again.