CRUTEM3v – August 1850. Phil had one thermometer record for the entire southern hemisphere, and was able to precisely calculate the hemispheric mean temperature anomaly of -1.182
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Is Antarctica Melting?
- High Speed Analysis And Visualization
- El Nino To The Rescue?
- Fake News Update
- Growth Of Antarctic Sea Ice
- 65 Years Of Progress!
- El Nino To The Rescue?
- Worst March Drought On Record
- ChartGL Process Control Demo
- The Biggest Money Laundering Scam
- Drought In The Headwaters Of Lake Powell
- Unrealistic Expectations Of Water Availibility
- Did Bill Gates Do This?
- Worst March Drought On Record In The US
- The Real Hockey Stick Graph
- Analyzing The Western Water Crisis
- Gaslighting 1924
- Climate Abstract Generator
- Climate Abstract Generator
- “Why Do You Resist?”
- Climate Attribution Model
- Fact Checking NASA
- Fact Checking Grok
- Fact Checking The New York Times
- New Visitech Features
Email Subscription
Join 1,948 other subscribersRecent Comments
saveenergy on Is Antarctica Melting? saveenergy on 65 Years Of Progress! Jeff L. on Analyzing The Western Water Cr… Morgan Wright on Great Lakes Approaching 100% I… Morgan Wright on Great Lakes Set Another Spring… gelcarrion0t on New Visitech Features saveenergy on Ice-Free Arctic By 2014 gelcarrion0t on Ice-Free Arctic By 2014 gelcarrion0t on Debt-Free US Treasury Forecast gelcarrion0t on Seventeen Years Of Fun


It would be amusing to plot the subsequent global temperature using data from only the same grid squares as used in the 1850 plot.
Yeah but Steve Mosher says this is how science is done and he trusts the scientists.
Backed by someone esle that post here! 😆
Else, LMAO!
I fear they’ve developed DRB Syndrome (dirty rotten bastard).
Phil’s buddy Trenberth ran quickly from Stratwarm studies a few years ago and someone needs to ask him why?
This is the same dead-certain teleconnection approach used by the tree-ring fraudsters to estimate global or NH temperatures in centuries past based on a few bristle cone pines in one location in the US Southwest, and assuming stationarity of the relationship between ring width or density and temperature.
Its BAU ‘climate science.’ What’s the problem?
It shows up how poor a technique it is to average temperatures over a geographical area. The temperature of one place is that place’s temperature only. It can not be smeared across a region, as currently done by Hansen et al, to try and give the globe an average temperature, when using fewer and fewer weather stations.
The full file gives the 95% confidence range for the August 1850 figure as between +0.323 and -2.911C.
http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/hadobs/crutem3/diagnostics/hemispheric/southern/monthly
Stop being an idiot.
Confidence range to 3 sig figs… That makes this metmess even worse!
LOL!!!!
You might as well assert you are 95% confident you have no idea what the temperature was. 😉