CRUTEM3v – August 1850. Phil had one thermometer record for the entire southern hemisphere, and was able to precisely calculate the hemispheric mean temperature anomaly of -1.182
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- National Climate Assessment Math
- Net Zero Progress
- London Cancels Hanukkah
- Denying Scientific Principles (Part 2)
- Beam Me Up Scotty
- Denying Scientific Principles (Part 2)
- Captain Kirk Says CO2 Will Kill Us All Very Soon
- Irish Hate Crimes
- Burn Acreage Fraud In The 2023 National Climate Assessment
- CNN Wants Carbon Passports
- Burn Acreage Fraud In The 2023 National Climate Assessment
- Global Boiling Day 125
- Terrifying Proof Of Global Warming
- Popular Science : China’s Electricity To Be One Third Renewable By 2025
- “You can get people to say anything”
- Crashing The Climate
- Groups Who Endanger You
- “How did humans get to the brink of crashing climate?”
- “Preparing the world for a new Ice Age”
- Denying Scientific Principles
- Sea Level Rise At New York
- Freezing Canada
- Climate Scamsters Slip Up
- Rapidly Increasing Sea Level
- Thing Of The Past Returns
Email Subscription
Join 1,903 other subscribersRecent Comments
Morgan Wright on Captain Kirk Says CO2 Will Kil… saveenergy on Freezing Canada Morgan Wright on Freezing Canada saveenergy on Leon Heller’s Doctoral T… daveburton on Leon Heller’s Doctoral T… JapanT on “dozens of former intel… Morgan Wright on Fleeing Desperate Circumstance… Frank Stagg on 100% Wind By 2030 Eric Barnes on “dozens of former intel… Disillusioned on Censorship Industrial Complex
It would be amusing to plot the subsequent global temperature using data from only the same grid squares as used in the 1850 plot.
Yeah but Steve Mosher says this is how science is done and he trusts the scientists.
Backed by someone esle that post here! 😆
Else, LMAO!
I fear they’ve developed DRB Syndrome (dirty rotten bastard).
Phil’s buddy Trenberth ran quickly from Stratwarm studies a few years ago and someone needs to ask him why?
This is the same dead-certain teleconnection approach used by the tree-ring fraudsters to estimate global or NH temperatures in centuries past based on a few bristle cone pines in one location in the US Southwest, and assuming stationarity of the relationship between ring width or density and temperature.
Its BAU ‘climate science.’ What’s the problem?
It shows up how poor a technique it is to average temperatures over a geographical area. The temperature of one place is that place’s temperature only. It can not be smeared across a region, as currently done by Hansen et al, to try and give the globe an average temperature, when using fewer and fewer weather stations.
The full file gives the 95% confidence range for the August 1850 figure as between +0.323 and -2.911C.
http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/hadobs/crutem3/diagnostics/hemispheric/southern/monthly
Stop being an idiot.
Confidence range to 3 sig figs… That makes this metmess even worse!
LOL!!!!
You might as well assert you are 95% confident you have no idea what the temperature was. 😉