Soot worse for global warming than thought
Soot particles may be twice as bad as the greenhouse gas carbon dioxide in contributing to global warming, suggests a new study.
Grains of soot deposited in snow have also caused about one-quarter of the observed rise in global surface temperature since 1880, suggests the model by James Hansen and Larissa Nazarenko. The pair examined how soot particles affect the atmosphere when they darken snow and ice.
Darkened snow traps more solar energy than pristine snow. The effect could explain why sea ice and glaciers are melting faster than expected from the increase in surface temperature alone, says Hansen of the NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies in New York.
“The effect of soot on snow is unambiguous,” he told New Scientist. “It causes a strong warming effect.”
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- The Real Hockey Stick Graph
- Analyzing The Western Water Crisis
- Gaslighting 1924
- Climate Abstract Generator
- Climate Abstract Generator
- “Why Do You Resist?”
- Climate Attribution Model
- Fact Checking NASA
- Fact Checking Grok
- Fact Checking The New York Times
- New Visitech Features
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2014
- Debt-Free US Treasury Forecast
- Analyzing Big City Crime (Part 2)
- Analyzing Big City Crime
- UK Migration Caused By Global Warming
- Climate Attribution In Greece
- Climate Attribution In Greece
- “Brown: ’50 days to save world'”
- The Catastrophic Influence of Bovine Methane Emissions on Extraterrestrial Climate Patterns
- Posting On X
- Seventeen Years Of Fun
- The Importance Of Good Tools
- Temperature Shifts At Blue Hill, MA
- CO₂²
Email Subscription
Join 1,944 other subscribersRecent Comments
Jeff L. on Analyzing The Western Water Cr… Morgan Wright on Great Lakes Approaching 100% I… Morgan Wright on Great Lakes Set Another Spring… gelcarrion0t on New Visitech Features saveenergy on Ice-Free Arctic By 2014 gelcarrion0t on Ice-Free Arctic By 2014 gelcarrion0t on Debt-Free US Treasury Forecast gelcarrion0t on Seventeen Years Of Fun Barbara Stockwell on Nuclear Safety In The US saveenergy on 100% Tariffs On Chinese EV…

This was obviously a different Hames Hansen.
It was actually James Jansen ;^)
There certainly be more than one Hames Hansen.
¼ of the rise from soot, ½ from the sun, 1/3 (or so) from water vapor, 1/8 from the Earth’s interior. That only leaves about 9/10 for Carbon dioxide, right?
How does someone so clueless find his way to work each morning? Models? If so, he sure as Hell did not design them.
So the Chinese soot is exempt somehow? Because that is apparently causing cooling..
Dust and soot frequently change properties to do the most possible harm to minorities, women and children – and particularly teenage girls like Rebecca Black.