Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- El Nino To The Rescue?
- Worst March Drought On Record
- ChartGL Process Control Demo
- The Biggest Money Laundering Scam
- Drought In The Headwaters Of Lake Powell
- Unrealistic Expectations Of Water Availibility
- Did Bill Gates Do This?
- Worst March Drought On Record In The US
- The Real Hockey Stick Graph
- Analyzing The Western Water Crisis
- Gaslighting 1924
- Climate Abstract Generator
- Climate Abstract Generator
- “Why Do You Resist?”
- Climate Attribution Model
- Fact Checking NASA
- Fact Checking Grok
- Fact Checking The New York Times
- New Visitech Features
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2014
- Debt-Free US Treasury Forecast
- Analyzing Big City Crime (Part 2)
- Analyzing Big City Crime
- UK Migration Caused By Global Warming
- Climate Attribution In Greece
Email Subscription
Join 1,944 other subscribersRecent Comments
Jeff L. on Analyzing The Western Water Cr… Morgan Wright on Great Lakes Approaching 100% I… Morgan Wright on Great Lakes Set Another Spring… gelcarrion0t on New Visitech Features saveenergy on Ice-Free Arctic By 2014 gelcarrion0t on Ice-Free Arctic By 2014 gelcarrion0t on Debt-Free US Treasury Forecast gelcarrion0t on Seventeen Years Of Fun Barbara Stockwell on Nuclear Safety In The US saveenergy on 100% Tariffs On Chinese EV…
USFS : “New trees will soon replace those killed by the beetle”
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

we will soon be told that to be killed by beetles is an important part of the pines’ lifecycle
Well, now that you mention it.
Actually it’s more accurate to say, clearing the canopy for understory growth, beetles that kill pines are an important part of the oak trees life cycle.
Minimial overlap between oaks and any of the pine species that are hit by this beetle, but your point makes complete sense in general.
It is typically the spruces that cheer on this beetle. Although they only cheer when no one is in the forest to hear them, of course.
It actually is, particularly for lodgepole pines. The only way they can dominate an area is with fire wiping out their longer-living competition (typically spruce). Note the only place they do dominate is in relatively dry fire-prone areas. Under ‘natural’ (pre-1492) conditions the fire cycle was regular and mature forests – which can host beetle epidemics were patchy, not the vast ones that just got killed. In any case, these beetle killed forests are now a huge fire waiting to happen… and when fire does hit it will kill off any competition and, most importantly, pop the seeds out of all the lodgepole pine cones and replant an even-aged monoculture which is what led to the vast areas of even-aged mature forests that made these huge epidemics possible.
They downplayed – almost lied – about the fact that mature forests are not just better than young forests, they are essential for the beetles because those trees have cambium layer thick enough to sustain beetles (in epidemics they attack younger trees due to their sheer numbers but they are not viable habitat… and those sheer numbers of beetles is what overwhelms even totally healthy vigorous mature trees).
So, for lodgepole pine, if fire doesn’t get them then the beetle will, and then fire. If fire doesn’t happen spruce wins out and the lodgepole pine – which cannot start growing in the shade of the spruce – loses.