Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- El Nino To The Rescue?
- Worst March Drought On Record
- ChartGL Process Control Demo
- The Biggest Money Laundering Scam
- Drought In The Headwaters Of Lake Powell
- Unrealistic Expectations Of Water Availibility
- Did Bill Gates Do This?
- Worst March Drought On Record In The US
- The Real Hockey Stick Graph
- Analyzing The Western Water Crisis
- Gaslighting 1924
- Climate Abstract Generator
- Climate Abstract Generator
- “Why Do You Resist?”
- Climate Attribution Model
- Fact Checking NASA
- Fact Checking Grok
- Fact Checking The New York Times
- New Visitech Features
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2014
- Debt-Free US Treasury Forecast
- Analyzing Big City Crime (Part 2)
- Analyzing Big City Crime
- UK Migration Caused By Global Warming
- Climate Attribution In Greece
Email Subscription
Join 1,944 other subscribersRecent Comments
Jeff L. on Analyzing The Western Water Cr… Morgan Wright on Great Lakes Approaching 100% I… Morgan Wright on Great Lakes Set Another Spring… gelcarrion0t on New Visitech Features saveenergy on Ice-Free Arctic By 2014 gelcarrion0t on Ice-Free Arctic By 2014 gelcarrion0t on Debt-Free US Treasury Forecast gelcarrion0t on Seventeen Years Of Fun Barbara Stockwell on Nuclear Safety In The US saveenergy on 100% Tariffs On Chinese EV…
97% Of Scientists Believe That Cities Are Built On Mudcracks
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.


“unleashed”…sounds about right…
Ah.. the consensus argument yet again. It’s shame these journalists appear to have never heard of Galileo, Einstein, nor of the Scientific Method.
Junk journalism at its best.. or worst, depending on how one looks at it.
Except that in this case, it is even worse. There were only 75 scientists that made up the so-called 97% consensus … the consensus odds were stacked much, much higher against Galileo and Einstein, as I am sure they had at least an 80+ person consensus against them!
97% of climate scientists are apparently feeding at the trough. If nothing is happening, how do they justify their salaries?
That would be ALL 75 of them …
Quite the picture. How can warmer temps. cause melting ice and lower seas at the same time?
If you have to ask that question you have not known anyone who has taken the “Magical Mystery Tour” of the climatology world!
Then you have this:
If you do not understand the lyrics of this Climatology song:
“Roll up, roll up for the mystery tour.
Roll up, roll up for the mystery tour.
Roll up AND THAT’S AN INVITATION, roll up for the mystery tour.
Roll up TO MAKE A RESERVATION, roll up for the mystery tour.
The magical mystery tour is waiting to take you away,
Waiting to take you away.
Roll up, roll up for the mystery tour.
Roll up, roll up for the mystery tour.
Roll up WE’VE GOT EVERYTHING YOU NEED, roll up for the mystery tour.
Roll up SATISFACTION GUARANTEED, roll up for the mystery tour.
The magical mystery tour is hoping to take you away,
Hoping to take you away.
Roll up, roll up for the mystery tour.
Roll up, roll up for the mystery tour.
Roll up AND THAT’S AN INVITATION, roll up for the mystery tour.
Roll up TO MAKE A RESERVATION, roll up for the mystery tour.
The magical mystery tour is coming to take you away,
Coming to take you away.
The magical mystery tour is dying to take you away,
Dying to take you away, take you away.
http://taz4158.tripod.com/magical.html
That at least was back in the day when music was really music! Long way down from there to Black Eyed Peas.
That’s a chick? YIKES!
Nicole Hodgson lectures in sustainability at Murdoch University, Western Australia.She is am also the President of the Conservation Council of WA (www.ccwa.org.au) and has a background with NGOs in the sustainability and environmental area.
http://www.abc.net.au/unleashed/nicole-hodgson-2778404.html
What a surprise, Ms. Nicole is on the AGW gravy train.
Maybe if she had a makeover she wouldn’t need to preoccupy herself with this climate nonsense.
So, am I to assume that ALL 75 of those “climate consensus scientists” are to be wrong? … I see what she means. I don’t see how that is plausible. All 75 of them? .. come on… /sarc