h/t to Marc Morano
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Recent Comments
saveenergy on 65 Years Of Progress! Jeff L. on Analyzing The Western Water Cr… Morgan Wright on Great Lakes Approaching 100% I… Morgan Wright on Great Lakes Set Another Spring… gelcarrion0t on New Visitech Features saveenergy on Ice-Free Arctic By 2014 gelcarrion0t on Ice-Free Arctic By 2014 gelcarrion0t on Debt-Free US Treasury Forecast gelcarrion0t on Seventeen Years Of Fun Barbara Stockwell on Nuclear Safety In The US
Didn’t they say all the polar bears would starve because of ice free arctic by 2013?
https://twitter.com/NJSnowFan/status/372794505453654016/photo/1
around 5:20 you will see the Polar Bear
http://obuoy.datatransport.org/monitor#buoy7/movie
Buoy #7
http://obuoy.datatransport.org/monitor#overview/gpstracks
Dessler is now a legitimate challenger to Mann for the dumbest dumbass professor award evah!
And when you bottom out at Mann’s desperation level, your condition is terminal.
Dessler has been at that level for years! And he keeps digging his hole!
Yup! They have been telling us for years and years that “the science is settled!” so why do they keep issuing new reports? Almost makes me question their sincerity… 🙂
He has no sincerity to question.
That can’t be true.
I was under the impression that it was a requirement that each successive report was more alarmist than the previous one!
If the next report is “exactly” what they told us, then they are unnecessarily killing trees, altering land use, changing the climate.
“The trees required to produce this report are partly responsible for the climate change thus far. Recommend we stop producing reports.”
What a bunch of arrogant….
You’d need to redesign the prison cages for these guys, seeing how they’re slimier than a grease monkey and would slip right through those cell bars-:)
Steve? I wonder if you might do a short bit on Arrhenius. Specifically, the FACT that he drastically lowered his estimate on climate sensitivity, some years after the 1896 date dudlser mentions.
I’ll second that. The climate predators never mention that part of his work (wonder why?).
Here’s a good source on Arrhenius’ mistake in his 1896 work that Dessler cites, and his later (sort of grudging – sound familiar?) scaling back of the warming predictions.
http://members.casema.nl/errenwijlens/co2/
It’s a close race to work out who is the bigger crank. Dessler or Trenberth?
So according to Clinton goon Dessler it’s the Same BS different day.
Basically the UN IPCC are like the jokers with the doomsday clock from back in the cold war days. .Well maybe the doomsday clock bunch had a tad more credibility.
Well funded Doomsayers. ..