Green shows ice present in 2013 which was not present in 2012. Red shows the opposite.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Recent Comments
Kent Clizbe on Scientific American Wants To… Morgan Wright on Scientific American Wants To… TimC on Please Enter The Boxcar Peacef… Disillusioned on Forecasting Climate Change Walter on 4-9 Degrees Warming At The Gre… Bob Greene on Dangerous Assault Rifle Morgan Wright on Scientists Are Alarmed vuurklip on Government To Save Us From Glo… Morgan Wright on Michael Mann Weighs In On Scie… Thomas Kirby on Michael Mann Weighs In On Scie…
Gaia Shrugged and left all the warmista shivering in the cold.
Game Over.
“adjustments” will turn this into a net loss. The Borg will not be denied their crisis.
How thick is all that blue ice?
Less than a millimeter. Depends on what kind of screen you are looking at.
Look at the difference in the proximity of the ice to the Alaskan coast. Somebody has decided not to count an awful lot of ice.
http://iceweb1.cis.ec.gc.ca/Prod20/page3.xhtml
Have not noticed the usual alarmist nutcases posting about Arctic ice extent lately.
I’m not able to track on this, Steve, using the linked source. That data seems to show these numbers for August 13, 2012 and 2013:
5178750 6152500
I make that an increase of 18.8%. Can you point me in the right direction?
Incidentally, I’ve updated the MLF spreadsheet; the crew is “pulling” for a very late October arrival, which seems likely to be a drag … over ice. Still technically possible — it might even be easier. But it’s not exactly a Northwest Passage.
===|==============/ Keith DeHavelle
I’m using their maps and comparing with a higher concentration threshold than their 15% calculations.
I will not be assimilated!