Sea level is about 2mm higher than it was seven years ago. It will only take 3,500 years to achieve 1 metre of rise, or 17,500 years to reach Hansen’s five metres this century forecast.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Global Warming Makes It Cold
- Global Sea Ice Area
- Canada
- “we’ve lost control”
- “we’ve lost control”
- National Climate Assessment Math
- Net Zero Progress
- London Cancels Hanukkah
- Denying Scientific Principles (Part 2)
- Beam Me Up Scotty
- Denying Scientific Principles (Part 2)
- Captain Kirk Says CO2 Will Kill Us All Very Soon
- Irish Hate Crimes
- Burn Acreage Fraud In The 2023 National Climate Assessment
- CNN Wants Carbon Passports
- Burn Acreage Fraud In The 2023 National Climate Assessment
- Global Boiling Day 125
- Terrifying Proof Of Global Warming
- Popular Science : China’s Electricity To Be One Third Renewable By 2025
- “You can get people to say anything”
- Crashing The Climate
- Groups Who Endanger You
- “How did humans get to the brink of crashing climate?”
- “Preparing the world for a new Ice Age”
- Denying Scientific Principles
Email Subscription
Join 1,903 other subscribersRecent Comments
Morgan Wright on Captain Kirk Says CO2 Will Kil… saveenergy on Freezing Canada Morgan Wright on Freezing Canada saveenergy on Leon Heller’s Doctoral T… daveburton on Leon Heller’s Doctoral T… JapanT on “dozens of former intel… Morgan Wright on Fleeing Desperate Circumstance… Frank Stagg on 100% Wind By 2030 Eric Barnes on “dozens of former intel… Disillusioned on Censorship Industrial Complex
the keyword is “unadjusted”
The “waves” ARE getting higher.
PS: I think Hansen was born ahead of his time, about 117,500 years ahead of his time. Maybe after the next Glacial Cycle, during the next Inter-Glacial, he just might be right for a day or two. Today he sounds like a cracked, scratched, warped, old broken record. I’m sorry, what is it that American Taxpayers are paying him and GISS to do? I keep forgetting.
So do he and his co-workers!
So when the data is adjusted, what is it adjusted for? Are these adjustments valid or are they open to question?
The main point of the adjustments is to remove seasonal and other temporal variations. They should not change the trend however, which they do. Indicating that they are wrong.
raw data should be indicated as “unfudged”
How long are the seasonal and other temporal variations?
People in low lying areas have plenty of time to adapt, assuming they need to adapt at all. Another example of crying “wolf” when there is no wolf.