Maybe the military can run their trucks and planes off wind power?
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- 65 Years Of Progress!
- El Nino To The Rescue?
- Worst March Drought On Record
- ChartGL Process Control Demo
- The Biggest Money Laundering Scam
- Drought In The Headwaters Of Lake Powell
- Unrealistic Expectations Of Water Availibility
- Did Bill Gates Do This?
- Worst March Drought On Record In The US
- The Real Hockey Stick Graph
- Analyzing The Western Water Crisis
- Gaslighting 1924
- Climate Abstract Generator
- Climate Abstract Generator
- “Why Do You Resist?”
- Climate Attribution Model
- Fact Checking NASA
- Fact Checking Grok
- Fact Checking The New York Times
- New Visitech Features
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2014
- Debt-Free US Treasury Forecast
- Analyzing Big City Crime (Part 2)
- Analyzing Big City Crime
- UK Migration Caused By Global Warming
Email Subscription
Join 1,948 other subscribersRecent Comments
saveenergy on 65 Years Of Progress! Jeff L. on Analyzing The Western Water Cr… Morgan Wright on Great Lakes Approaching 100% I… Morgan Wright on Great Lakes Set Another Spring… gelcarrion0t on New Visitech Features saveenergy on Ice-Free Arctic By 2014 gelcarrion0t on Ice-Free Arctic By 2014 gelcarrion0t on Debt-Free US Treasury Forecast gelcarrion0t on Seventeen Years Of Fun Barbara Stockwell on Nuclear Safety In The US


Can they really be that dumb? Any of those dimwits wonder why they don’t just drive up to the filling station and fill up with petrol or diesel? Or why they don’t just plug in the existing grid? Oh, wait, maybe because it isn’t a viable option. So, what? We’re going to build miles of transmission lines in war areas? No way anything could possibly go wrong with that line of thinking.
Wonder what the Taliban count is for Predator attacks?
Run trucks/planes off of wind? I think not. Evan a cursory examination of the Navy’s plan (abstract found here: http://www.navy.mil/local/nee/) shows that’s not what the Navy has in mind.
People are getting killed transporting deisel to forward bases. The less fuel used the fewer people die. The diesel being transported is used in generators to create electricity that is used to cool/heat tents. Improvements in tent materials, microgrid power management and incorporation of renewables such as microhydro can significantly reduce fuel consumption thereby saving lives.
Most of the Navy’s ships are deisel powered. Improvements in power production and/or the incorporation of lower cost/higher density fuels has the potential to reduce costs substatially (we’re talking of 100s of millions) and increase time on station.
Recently the Navy flew an F18 using biofuel, when they set their mind to it the Navy has a pretty good track record of acomplishing amazing things.
Most of the Navy’s ships are powered by Gas Turbines, the same fuel guzzling thing that powers planes, same as the M1 Tank.
Power to weight ratio, it’s the cat’s meow, but even at idle speeds it’s guzzling diesel, and I don’t care what you fill it with.
The logistics cost to support our troops is horrendous and is driven mostly by the need to supply fuel.
It is a travesty that the US military is still stuck in the fossil fuel age for base power, heating and cooling.
We deliver fuel at exorbitant expense, about $100/gallon plus human lives, by truck across more than 1000 miles of poor roads through an antagonistic population to do what should be done by a small, self contained nuclear reactor such as Toshiba has on offer.