Actually, make that 100% ….
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- New Video : Analyzing Oil And Gas
- Is Antarctica Melting?
- High Speed Analysis And Visualization
- El Nino To The Rescue?
- Fake News Update
- Growth Of Antarctic Sea Ice
- 65 Years Of Progress!
- El Nino To The Rescue?
- Worst March Drought On Record
- ChartGL Process Control Demo
- The Biggest Money Laundering Scam
- Drought In The Headwaters Of Lake Powell
- Unrealistic Expectations Of Water Availibility
- Did Bill Gates Do This?
- Worst March Drought On Record In The US
- The Real Hockey Stick Graph
- Analyzing The Western Water Crisis
- Gaslighting 1924
- Climate Abstract Generator
- Climate Abstract Generator
- “Why Do You Resist?”
- Climate Attribution Model
- Fact Checking NASA
- Fact Checking Grok
Email Subscription
Join 1,948 other subscribersRecent Comments
gelcarrion0t on New Video : Analyzing Oil And… saveenergy on Is Antarctica Melting? saveenergy on 65 Years Of Progress! Jeff L. on Analyzing The Western Water Cr… Morgan Wright on Great Lakes Approaching 100% I… Morgan Wright on Great Lakes Set Another Spring… gelcarrion0t on New Visitech Features saveenergy on Ice-Free Arctic By 2014 gelcarrion0t on Ice-Free Arctic By 2014 gelcarrion0t on Debt-Free US Treasury Forecast

This is probably the only way that man-made global warming will kill anyone. Out of the desperation of the Church of Climatology to prove their point.
Back when that controversy first ‘blew up’, I noted how quickly our friends at Greenpeace exploited it: See “SplatterGate: When Greenpeace is given lemons, they make lemonade” http://www.freedompub.org/profiles/blogs/splattergate-when-greenpeace
In this case, the Greenpeace spokesperson once again deflects the narrative back to their propaganda about scheming skeptics, and you know this will soon be regurgitated by left-wing bloggers in viral form. Thus, the fundamental premise of the video is promoted after all – anybody with opposing viewpoints must be viewed with suspicion.
97% of scientists do too. So scientists are children.
Lovely logic:
1) 97% of schoolchildren believe in global warming;
2) 97% of scientists believe in global warming; so,
3) schoolchildren are scientists.
Similarly,
1) schoolchildren believe in global warming because of ideological indoctrination;
2) scientists also believe in global warming; so,
3) scientists are ideologically indoctrinated.
Is that right, DEEBEE?
OT
Doh!
Lech Walesa snubs Obama
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1391520/Barack-Obama-snubbed-Lech-Walesa-Warsaw-trip.html#ixzz1NaO2LHIf
97% of schoolchildren also believe in Santa Claus.