0.0C anomaly. In Fahrenheit that would be approximately 0.0F.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Recent Comments
saveenergy on 65 Years Of Progress! Jeff L. on Analyzing The Western Water Cr… Morgan Wright on Great Lakes Approaching 100% I… Morgan Wright on Great Lakes Set Another Spring… gelcarrion0t on New Visitech Features saveenergy on Ice-Free Arctic By 2014 gelcarrion0t on Ice-Free Arctic By 2014 gelcarrion0t on Debt-Free US Treasury Forecast gelcarrion0t on Seventeen Years Of Fun Barbara Stockwell on Nuclear Safety In The US
But in Hansenius, that’s at least 5 degrees…… +5H
lol, it was nice of you to offer the Celsius to Fahrenheit conversion for free!
I used my calculator.
LOL it was very funny!
Andy W would only have asked otherwise.
It was the “approximately” that made it sing.
It was a nice touch! … and saved me hundreds of hours of CPU time to figure it out myself … 😉
Wouldn’t 0°C be 32° F?
Dirk, we’re talking anomaly—— In other words how far it deviates from the mean…… so if it doesn’t deviate in F is doesn’t deviate in C.
ROFLMAO … Sorry Dirk, you just hit a funny bone with me on that one …
La Nina is still in progress in Niño 3.4 so temperatures are going to continue to go into negative anomaly for months.
http://weather.unisys.com/surface/sst_anom.gif
I am in agreement. I think your right. A quick play with the AMSU temperature toy gives me the feeling that we are still going negative.
Steve, I disagree. I went out to the AMSU temperature toy and using AQUA channel 5, we have been below the average almost the entire month (0.40c cooler than 4/23/2010). My prediction would be a -0.16c anomaly (+/- 0.02c). Every channel is showing an average of 0.40c cooler than last year, and approx. 0.15c cooler through almost the entire month thus far. I think the anomaly is going more negative than it is presently (-0.10c). Should be fun to see. 😉