4 Responses to Scientific American Warns Readers Not To Look At Actual Data

1. omnologos says:

   March 22, 2011 at 7:34 pm

   Rabid AGWers beware…ut sementem feceris, ita metes

   Loading...

   Reply
2. Al Gored says:

   March 22, 2011 at 8:28 pm

   Scientific American is not scientific or American.

   The lack of science is obvious. And it, along with Nature, is owned by some German family who had good connections with the 1930s-1945 regime there, and who seem to have a lot invested in the AGW crisis industry.

   Their credibility ended years back when they launched their attack on Lomborg’s book, The Skeptical Environmentalist. Its been all downhill from there. So let’s rename it The Post-Normal Pseudoscientific German and get it over with.

   Loading...

   Reply
3. Blade says:

   March 23, 2011 at 3:56 am

   Scientific Un-American.

   Scientific Anti-American.

   Or we could just call it Omni. What’s the difference really.

   Loading...

   Reply
   • omnologos says:

     March 23, 2011 at 5:06 pm

     yup, I was thinking the same with SA competing for newsagent space alongside Focus and New Scientist

     Loading...

     Reply