A Fine Spring Day In Unfrozen Greenland And Antarctica

Posted on March 11, 2011 by Tony Heller

Mid-day temperatures range from -57F in the center of the ice sheet, all the way up to 20F on the tropical southern coast.

http://www.wunderground.com/global/GL.html

The other ice sheet is also melting down faster than expected, at -70F

http://www.wunderground.com/

About Tony Heller

Just having fun
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

7 Responses to A Fine Spring Day In Unfrozen Greenland And Antarctica

  1. Scarlet Pumpernickel says:
    March 11, 2011 at 12:19 pm

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-12687272

    U see this crap???

    Reply
  2. AndyW says:
    March 11, 2011 at 12:45 pm

    It’s not crap Scarlet, unless you want to put your money where your mouth is and do some research and present counter evidence to scientific peer review?

    Sorry, you want it to be crap don’t you. Subtle difference 😉

    Andy

    Reply
    • stevengoddard says:
      March 11, 2011 at 12:48 pm

      OK
      http://stevengoddard.wordpress.com/2011/03/11/jpl-explains-that-3mm-is-larger-than-6mm/

      The amazing thing about peer review is that complete crap gets through all the time.

      Reply
    • Paul H says:
      March 11, 2011 at 4:29 pm

      Andy

      As there is no data to show the rate of melt before 1990 they simply don’t know whether the rate is increasing or not. Hence all they can say is that is that the rate is more than models predict. Rather meaningless I think.

      “Writing in Geophysical Research Letters, the team says ice loss here is speeding up faster than models predict.”

      Reply
    • Roger says:
      March 11, 2011 at 4:35 pm

      Peer review? Any prognostication that includes conditional words such as “if” “could” etc., fully justifies the use of the descriptive word crap.
      Scientific peer review requires scientists, and so far very few AGW tax sustained researchers could qualify for that description.

      Reply
  3. Andy Weiss says:
    March 11, 2011 at 5:41 pm

    Peer review means:

    1. We all spout the AGW party line and make it sound as frightening as possible.
    2. We never criticize one of our own (even if what they say is absurd).
    3. We ostracize and demonize anyone who disagrees with AGW doomsday scenarios.
    4. We slobber in unison for handouts we need to keep the gravy train rolling.

    Reply
  4. gofer says:
    March 11, 2011 at 8:37 pm

    So there was no ice added??? Is there supposed to be a net ice loss?

    Reply

Leave a Reply