This (even more clueless) John Cook wannabe thinks that the Arctic Basin is normally 100% concentration ice.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Recent Comments
saveenergy on 65 Years Of Progress! Jeff L. on Analyzing The Western Water Cr… Morgan Wright on Great Lakes Approaching 100% I… Morgan Wright on Great Lakes Set Another Spring… gelcarrion0t on New Visitech Features saveenergy on Ice-Free Arctic By 2014 gelcarrion0t on Ice-Free Arctic By 2014 gelcarrion0t on Debt-Free US Treasury Forecast gelcarrion0t on Seventeen Years Of Fun Barbara Stockwell on Nuclear Safety In The US
What I would like to know. How much ice was there in the Arctic 3,000 yrs ago, just a blink of the eye on geological time, when these trees, recently uncovered by glacier melt, were growing.
http://www.cseg.ca/publications/recorder/2008/09sep/sep2008-gussow-nuna.pdf
scroll down a few pages.
Cook, says the ice is less than it should be. I guess these trees should not have been either. Of course, if he is found completely wrong in September, no matter, he meant well.
Steve,
You are the expert. What do you say? At least you are willing to post this.
Andy
I’m not an expert, but the ice is always torn apart by the wind and normally is 5-10% open water.
Craig’s strawmen in the comments following the article accentuate his cluelessness.
Here again we have AGW folks using very, very short time periods, like a week, or in this case one winter, showing us their definitions of climate versus weather.
They are auditioning for “Worst Fantasy Writer Awards”! However they are a blessing to those that are sceptic about the Chicken Little Brigade claims! Most everything they write proves our claims!
If ice is so good, why doesn’t the journalist go sit in the freezer for a couple of hours and see what happens?
Their prediction will be wrong. But no matter, they’ll continue to believe in global warming disasters anyway.