Data Tampering On The Other Side Of The Pond

I am headed to the UK this week, so I thought I would check out what sort of fraud Phil Jones has been up to get rid of the hiatus.

The graph below shows the hockey stick of data tampering that Phil has done to get rid of the hiatus since 2013

ScreenHunter_2339 Jun. 08 11.36
2015 version :
2013 version :

About Tony Heller

Just having fun
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

22 Responses to Data Tampering On The Other Side Of The Pond

  1. Lawrence 13 says:

    If you’re in London and need a ride around to look at sights (outside the congestion charge-let me know. Myself for example: In Sydenham live just a mile away from the Earnest Shackleton family home in Westwood Hill and the same distance from Admiral Fitzroy’s house where he committed suicide in Church Road and buried in All Saints Church. Why even Boris Karloff’s home down in Peckham/Honour Oak. I’ll spin you over to Eltham several miles away to see where Bob Hope lived. There’s just tons of local history why I might even throw in (about five miles )Gravesend where Pocahontas is buried. There also the site in Crystal Place park where Rammel’s pneumatic railway mysteriously closed down after on several months

    Ic an also show you the latest teen murder stabbing spot just around the corner to where I live as a testament to post WWII and lefty liberalism.

    Seriously Tony if you have a day in London free and want to see for nothing all these interesting sights, let me know.

    Yes I know it sounds creepy but I am a Londoner and I do love the steep history of London Town and its suburbs

    • darrylb says:

      Before I am too close to being a pile of dust, I would absolutely love to see the sights in the parts in England you describe. Most of my Ancestry, obviously poor and simple folk, were from the Alsace area between France and Germany who came over here with only the shirts on their back while not speaking English. They did so after the failure to overthrow Napoleon the third. I have great and increasing admiration for them.
      and I have great and compelling admiration for and interest in the history of lives and events in London Town. and the surrounding areas.

      Also, any hopes of having a Winston Churchill reincarnation over there? We have made the most untimely choice as to when we could elect a Nobel Prize winning president like we have done. And have done it twice yert
      But I must say that some people that I know who voted for B. Obama now detest the man
      As usual, lies and more lies eventually lead to scorn.
      Too much adoration can make most of us think we are above reality and are shocked when reality hits..

    • I will keep that in mind, thanks. Not quite sure what our plans are yet.

  2. QV says:

    And of course, the difference between HadCrut4 and HadCrut3 is even greater.
    MO temperature predictions based on HadCrut3 failed (on the whole), but based on HadCRUT4 they were much better. Primarily because 1998 was demoted.

    • Jones: (Ring, Ring).. Mike.. Mike!! wake the hell up… (Sound: slap of Hockey Stick)…
      Mann: Aw C’mon Phil why you so…
      Jones: It’s Goddard!! That sneak is flying to London.. we need to do something!
      Mann: Phil, its 5 in the morning here… I’m ugh .. I … ugh..
      Jones: Listen Mike.. despite all the Carbon Taxes and Credits which go directly into Al Gore’s Swiss Bank Account.. despite all that.. Goddard was able to afford a Flight here!!
      Mann: What, er… ugh… I thought we banished him to Colorado??
      Jones: Apparently he was able to escape our Carbon sensors.. he bicycled to the Airport… Dahrrrrrr… Goddard is crafty!!
      Gavin: Caaaaarbon Credits…
      Trenberth: Yea, Caaaaarbon Credits…
      Jones: Shut up you 2 Oafs!! I’m trying to control the World here!! Gooodard!!

  3. omanuel says:

    Yes, data tampering occurs on both sides of the pond because Stalin effectively won WWII and united nations [UN] and independent national academies of science [NAS] into an Orwellian Ministry of Consensus Science Truth on 24 Oct 1945:

    The US NAS betrayed the trust of the American public after 1945 but still controls mainstream science by reviewing annual research budgets of research agencies – NASA, DOE, EPA, NSF, etc. – for Congress.

    • omanuel says:

      The UK’s Royal Society is the NAS across the pond.

      Fred Hoyle published papers in the Proceedings of the Royal Society that changed the internal composition of the Sun from:

      1. Mostly iron (Fe) in 1945 to
      2. Mostly hydrogen (H) in 1946

      It is probably no mere coincidence that another British author of science fiction, George Orwell, started writing Nineteen Eighty-Four in 1946.

    • omanuel says:

      Guidelines for data tampering preceded large scale space age funding.

      A “Bilderberg Model of the Sun” [1] was
      developed and published as an international consensus in 1968, . . . perhaps so future space scientists would know which data to hide or manipulate in order to get space science funding.

      Here are four irrefutable conclusions [2-4] from precise experimental data the National Academies of Sciences hid, manipulated or ignored after Stalin won WWII and united nations (UN) and national academies of science (NAS) into a giant “Orwellian Ministry of Consensus Scientific Truths:

      1. Anthropogenic Global Warming is false: The Sun controls Earth’s climate

      2. The Standard Solar Model is a lie: Stars make and discard hydrogen

      3. Big Bang Cosmology is false: The universe has no known limits

      4. The Standard Nuclear Model is a lie: Each neutron repels other neutrons

      Mainstream scientific literature on all sides of the pond evolved into scientific rubbish after nations and formerly independent national academies of science were united into an Orwellian Ministry of Consensus Scientific Truths on 24 Oct 1945.


      1. O. Gingerich and Cees De Jager, “The Bilderberg model of the photosphere and low chromosphere,” Solar Physics 3, 5-25 (1968):

      2. “Solar Energy,” Adv. Astron. (submitted 1 Sept 2104; published privately 17 Mar 2015)

      3. “Supplement for Teachers” (published 30 Mar 2015)

      4. “Intro: Science for Teachers” (published 23 May 2015)

  4. A Y scale of 0.0 to 0.04 C. Plot this on a real graph with honest scales and can’t even see it. What’s the uncertainty here? How does anybody measure temperatures to .001C? These numbers are statistical artifacts, not real measurements.

    • Bob Greene says:

      The same way you build fine furniture with rulers that measure no better than 1″. You also notice that they do not do standard deviations or uncertainty with those mean values and do not do any statistical testing to determine if the means are statistically different.

    • bit chilly says:

      this is climate science, we will have less talk of measuring things. a climate scientist would not lower him or herself to measuring things . reanalysis data all the way baby 😉

    • They upped the temperatures by 0.04C, so that they could claim a record by 0,01C

  5. richard says:

    It’s June and i am still using a fan heater and an electric blanket. WhereTF is this warming.

  6. rah says:

    Well it’s been seasonably hot and muggy here in central Indiana the last couple days.

  7. Andy DC says:

    Big cooling requires even bigger adjustments!

  8. omanuel says:

    Data tampering is the way unqualified scientists “shoot themselves in the foot.”

    1. Solar physicists hid or ignored experimental evidence of severe mass fractionation in the Sun that selectively enriched lightweight atoms at the top of the photosphere.

    2. Nuclear physicists tried but failed to fuse helium atoms (He-4) together to make carbon (C-12) and oxygen (O-16) in the ratio of O/C = 2, as it is at the top of the photosphere of the Sun and other ordinary stars.

    When corrected for mass fractionation, the O/C ratio in the interior of the Sun is much more like that produced in laboratory fusion of He into O/C ~ 10 [“The oxygen to carbon ratio in the solar interior: Information from nuclear reaction cross-sections,” Journal of Fusion Energy 23, 55-62 (2005)].

  9. Hifast says:

    Reblogged this on Climate Collections and commented:
    I have replicated the process and independently verified and validated Heller’s assertion that the HADCRUT4 data posted in 2013 has been altered. The 2015 version of the data demonstrates statistically significant higher temperatures for the period 1998 – 2013.

    This begs the questions:
    1. Why wasn’t the 2013 version of the data correct in the first place?
    2. Why change the pre-2013 data?
    3. If the HADCRU process is so capricious and the data so unsettled, why give any credibility to the 2015 version, if it is subject to change.

    The data are quite unsettled. And the lack of scientific rigor is quite unsettling.

    • QV says:

      The data were adjusted retrospectively to make their forecasted temperatures more accurate,
      Primarily the switch from HadCRUT3 to HadCRUT4.
      If you get the forecasts wrong, simply adjust the data to make them correct.

  10. omanuel says:

    Data tampering will stop the minute the President of the US National Academy of Sciences, the climatologist – Dr. Ralph Cicerone – tells other climatologists to stop lying to the American public.

    Data tampering will continue as long as Dr. Ralph Cicerone and the US NAS are willing to direct more federal research funds to climatologist who adjust temperature data to fit the government’s flawed global climate models.

Leave a Reply