Less than a decade after the painfully dry year of 2002, the Upper Colorado River Basin is laden with snowpack that’s 160 percent of average. Total runoff this spring and summer will be huge, potentially swelling creeks and rivers to record volumes. Flush with inflows, reservoirs will fill and spill.
An Associated Press article from Dec. 5, 2008, asserted, “Western U.S. states will face more water shortages in the years ahead as climate change exacerbates the strains drought has put on the Colorado River.”
Apparently, the “scientific consensus” doesn’t have a clue about climate. Or maybe it does. To show warming trends, models used by the International Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) depend on the assumption that climate change is man-induced. At the same time, U.S. government-funded research by Dr. Roy Spencer and others is providing mounting evidence that climate change is natural and cyclical.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Recent Comments
gelcarrion0t on New Video : Analyzing Oil And… saveenergy on Is Antarctica Melting? saveenergy on 65 Years Of Progress! Jeff L. on Analyzing The Western Water Cr… Morgan Wright on Great Lakes Approaching 100% I… Morgan Wright on Great Lakes Set Another Spring… gelcarrion0t on New Visitech Features saveenergy on Ice-Free Arctic By 2014 gelcarrion0t on Ice-Free Arctic By 2014 gelcarrion0t on Debt-Free US Treasury Forecast
Looks like a ton of more precip, some mountain snow, out west over the next several days.
Over the past weekend, Mt. Hamilton near San Francisco received snowfall totaling three quarters of an inch. That doesn’t sound like a big deal, but the weather station on top of Mt. Hamilton had never previously received snow in May since records started in 1947.
Even the CIA wrote a paper on global cooling. There sure was a lot going on without a consensus. The reason is obvious….the “consensus” people decided post-mortem there was no consensus, because that was the ONLY defense available for this huge embarrassment. BTW, that seems to be an “official” talking point, since it pops out no matter what venue one happens to be in when discussing this paradox.