According to the world’s leading ice experts, “ice-free” means the size of Texas and California combined. The PIOMAS model shows that this will happen this year or next.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Recent Comments
saveenergy on Is Antarctica Melting? saveenergy on 65 Years Of Progress! Jeff L. on Analyzing The Western Water Cr… Morgan Wright on Great Lakes Approaching 100% I… Morgan Wright on Great Lakes Set Another Spring… gelcarrion0t on New Visitech Features saveenergy on Ice-Free Arctic By 2014 gelcarrion0t on Ice-Free Arctic By 2014 gelcarrion0t on Debt-Free US Treasury Forecast gelcarrion0t on Seventeen Years Of Fun
Only the insane would say that something that is obviously there, is not there.
In their world the Black Knight is ‘wound free’.
More python, and less lip.
Actually I type with my fingers…
@gator69 here’s a clip for your archive’s
Ah yes, every village has its idiot, and cities are simply loaded with them. Cidiots, I call them.
Tragic loss for the Ice Harvester’s Union.
More folks without a job.
…and what the hell is an “ice expert” anyway ?
“Yup, it’s frozen.”
“X is an unknown quantity and Spurt is a drip under pressure”. Oldie but a goodie.
In fact, most “climatologists” will secretly admit that the climate(X) is an unknown quantity and that they(the Spurts) are under pressure to put out more (dodgy) reports to ensure their government funding grants are renewed.
Definitions of Ice Expert: –
a person trained in mathematics trying to apply it to a chemical substance (water), or;
a person who studies methlylamphetamines; or
a person who manufactures methylamphetamines; or
a person of eskimo racial origin with thousands of years of actual collective experience with arctic ice.
I know who I’d listen to if I wanted to know anything about polar ice.
I bet PIOMAS will tamper with ice thickness data so that their model will get to zero despite the Ice Extent being around 2 to 5 million sq km. Their current volume numbers already look dodgy. Average ice thickness looks a lot more than their numbers. Are they “adjusting” either the average thickness or the extent?
Don’t bother with sea ice, it’s a large variable, PIOMAS on the other hand is so alarmist, I don’t trust their data. I’m just saying!