Plug your ears! The Guardian says that NASA rocket scientists who put men on the moon must not be listened to, as they do not support the church of global warming orthodoxy.
The Guardian says that we must listen only to incompetent buffoons like James Hansen, who have a spectacular record of failure stretching many decades.
 | gelcarrion0t on Australia Permanent Drought Up… |
| gelcarrion0t on “New computer modeling… |
 | Morgan Wright on Climate Destroying Shrimp |
 | Christopher Simpson on 1896 : Japan Hit By Earthquake… |
 | energywise on What’s At Stake? |
 | Robert Cherba on Too Hot To Live |
| gelcarrion0t on Too Hot To Live |
 | Nicholas McGinley on “The world began to end… |
| Nicholas McGinley on “The world began to end… |
| Nicholas McGinley on “The world began to end… |
The Guardian had a double digit loss in subscribers last year and with the likes of Skeptical Science’s Dana Nuticelli and the Climate Rapid Response Team’s John Abraham involved, it’s no surprise. lol
Yet they are funding a new website version in Australia, to lecture Australians on how to wail for the climate. The Guardian are like the professional funeral wailers in Japan, that make lots of money crying crocodile tears for someone they have never met. The Guardian is the wailing wall of climate.
May their tribe decrease…
California Seizes Guns as Owners Lose Right to Keep Arms
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-03-12/california-seizes-guns-as-owners-lose-right-to-bear-arms.html?cmpid=yhoo
The Guardian has been the propaganda pamphlet for the AGW religion for some time now. I agree with Sundance, they’re business model is doomed as hard copy news becomes redundant. Kids get more from Wikipedia and Tumblr than the MSM.
If every last one of the Apollo rockets had missed the Moon by several lunar diameters; if Voyagers 1 and 2 had crashed, respectively, into Boise, Idaho and the Sun; and if all of the other space missions launched between Sputnik and last Tuesday had been costly failures consuming hundreds of billions of taxpayer dollars while producing no measurable benefits whatsoever – only then would NASA’s engineers, astronauts and rocket scientists be on a par with James Hansen, Michael Mann, and their ilk, and thus be qualified to airily pontificate with equal infallibility in the lofty milieu of climate science.
You mean the deniers that faked the Moon landing? 😉
Well, of course…The Guardian is liberal, and they’re the media! They’re waaaaay smarter than rocket scientists.
They have a point, space… that bit between the ears.
“…A letter from former administrators, astronauts, and engineers at NASA expressing climate change scepticism does not deserve parity with the agency’s peer-reviewed climate scientists…”
And, look at some of the people we might see on their list:
Hansen, arrested multiple times for trespassing.
Gleik, admitted wire-fraud.
McKibben, author, no peer-reviewed papers.
Gore, ex-VP, no peer-reviewed papers.
Last but not least, Mann: who knowingly used upside-down data in his “peer-reviewed” paper.
If any of those former administrators, astronauts, and engineers at NASA had used data in the same manner as Mann did, we wouldn’t have landed on the Moon.
We’d be at the center of the earth, where the temperature is a million degrees or so.
Reblogged this on Climate Ponderings and commented:
Trust the Climate scientists [?] cause their projections have never been validated.