Guardian Says Not To Take Rocket Scientists Seriously

Plug your ears! The Guardian says that NASA rocket scientists who put men on the moon must not be listened to, as they do not support the church of global warming orthodoxy.

ScreenHunter_187 Mar. 12 12.56

Attacks on climate science by former NASA staff shouldn’t be taken seriously | Environment |

The Guardian says that we must listen only to incompetent buffoons like James Hansen, who have a spectacular record of failure stretching many decades.

About Tony Heller

Just having fun
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

11 Responses to Guardian Says Not To Take Rocket Scientists Seriously

  1. Sundance says:

    The Guardian had a double digit loss in subscribers last year and with the likes of Skeptical Science’s Dana Nuticelli and the Climate Rapid Response Team’s John Abraham involved, it’s no surprise. lol

    • Michael says:

      Yet they are funding a new website version in Australia, to lecture Australians on how to wail for the climate. The Guardian are like the professional funeral wailers in Japan, that make lots of money crying crocodile tears for someone they have never met. The Guardian is the wailing wall of climate.

  2. bubbagyro says:

    May their tribe decrease…

  3. Andy Oz says:

    The Guardian has been the propaganda pamphlet for the AGW religion for some time now. I agree with Sundance, they’re business model is doomed as hard copy news becomes redundant. Kids get more from Wikipedia and Tumblr than the MSM.

  4. DN says:

    If every last one of the Apollo rockets had missed the Moon by several lunar diameters; if Voyagers 1 and 2 had crashed, respectively, into Boise, Idaho and the Sun; and if all of the other space missions launched between Sputnik and last Tuesday had been costly failures consuming hundreds of billions of taxpayer dollars while producing no measurable benefits whatsoever – only then would NASA’s engineers, astronauts and rocket scientists be on a par with James Hansen, Michael Mann, and their ilk, and thus be qualified to airily pontificate with equal infallibility in the lofty milieu of climate science.

  5. gator69 says:

    You mean the deniers that faked the Moon landing? 😉

  6. leftinbrooklyn says:

    Well, of course…The Guardian is liberal, and they’re the media! They’re waaaaay smarter than rocket scientists.

  7. Sparks says:

    They have a point, space… that bit between the ears.

  8. “…A letter from former administrators, astronauts, and engineers at NASA expressing climate change scepticism does not deserve parity with the agency’s peer-reviewed climate scientists…”

    And, look at some of the people we might see on their list:

    Hansen, arrested multiple times for trespassing.
    Gleik, admitted wire-fraud.
    McKibben, author, no peer-reviewed papers.
    Gore, ex-VP, no peer-reviewed papers.

    Last but not least, Mann: who knowingly used upside-down data in his “peer-reviewed” paper.

    If any of those former administrators, astronauts, and engineers at NASA had used data in the same manner as Mann did, we wouldn’t have landed on the Moon.

    We’d be at the center of the earth, where the temperature is a million degrees or so.

  9. kim2ooo says:

    Reblogged this on Climate Ponderings and commented:
    Trust the Climate scientists [?] cause their projections have never been validated.

Leave a Reply