The Hayhoe argument goes – we are all stupid and/or corrupt, so you must trust us.
Wood for Trees: Interactive Graphs
The reality is that there is virtually no debate among climate scientists on the following points: 1. The earth is warming. 2. The main cause for this warming is the increasing production of carbon dioxide and other heat-trapping gases from human activities. 3. The impacts of climate change are already occurring, and will become more severe and even potentially dangerous the longer we allow this problem to continue unchecked. Yes, scientists love to argue. We could argue for years over the impact of soot particles on cloud formation, or the pathway that Atlantic hurricanes might follow in a warmer world. But those who actually study the earth, and study climate, are not arguing over the reality of this issue. That debate was settled many decades ago. The evidence is overwhelming. Climate change is real.
“That debate was settled many decades ago.”
Many 1: consisting of or amounting to a large but indefinite number
When was the debate settled sweety?
The debate was settled when realists realized there was nothing to debate, but the lack of intelligence displayed by “Katty” and the rest of the Chicken Little Brigade.
Hey Mike! Big day coming soon. 😉
All the best!
I guess Richard Lindzen doesn’t count. Ms, Kathy has put the case to bed.
Or Roy Spencer, or Dr. Tim Ball, or Judith Curry, or Prof. Fritz Vahrenholt, or William Kininmonth, or Robert M. Carter, Ph.D, Ph. D., or Joe D’Aleo, PhD, or Dr. Benny Peiser, or Svend Hendriksen, or Dr. William Cotton, or Chris De Freitas, or….
Climate change is real. It has been happening for 4,540,000,000 years.
That short of a time! We better hurry and do something about it! 😉
When was a debate allowed?
Since non believers were never allowed to participate in the process, peer review is just a circle jerk among true believers. Not exactly the scientific method.
For decades Engineers have been looking for ways to improve thermal efficiency for a whole swag of engines and turbines – all the while “heat trapping gases” have been available to them to achieve this nirvana.
If only they’d listened to climate scientists the world could have significantly improved fuel efficiency decades ago.
Do these climate alarmists actually have any clue about reality and realise what they are saying ???