http://www.climatesciencewatch.org/
h/t to Marc Morano
| gelcarrion0t on New Video : Analyzing Oil And… | |
| saveenergy on Is Antarctica Melting? | |
| saveenergy on 65 Years Of Progress! | |
| Jeff L. on Analyzing The Western Water Cr… | |
| Morgan Wright on Great Lakes Approaching 100% I… | |
| Morgan Wright on Great Lakes Set Another Spring… | |
| gelcarrion0t on New Visitech Features | |
| saveenergy on Ice-Free Arctic By 2014 | |
| gelcarrion0t on Ice-Free Arctic By 2014 | |
| gelcarrion0t on Debt-Free US Treasury Forecast |
Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

You have to see the irony and humor in all of this….
when you run out of money, what’s the first to go
…the liberal BS
serendipity afoot
I was thinking of Watts vs Romm, Goddard vs Romm, McIntyre vs Schmidt. it’s the same story repeating itself.
You too!
Slowly but surely sanity is making a comeback. Remember the Cancún climate change summit when Japan refused point blank to extend Kyoto? Slowly but surely we are getting there.
Blinding, diamond…..I have run out of superlatives already.
Nevertheless, there are still many more White Elephants to bag. Who is next, GISS, CRU….?
I think they already defunded all climate related efforts at NASA. They want the agency to focus on Space endeavors. Fancy that.
What a nice smile I had when I read this
Alfred Nobel invented smokeless gun powder.
Just saying.
Now let’s see what the Senate does with it.
Luetkemeyer: Scientists manipulated climate data, suppressed legitimate arguments in peer-reviewed journals, and researchers were asked to destroy emails, so that a small number of climate alarmists could continue to advance their environmental agenda.
I guess someone is paying attention.
Implying that hearings are afoot.
It’s a start. They need to defund Agenda 21 too. A friend tells me the parks service has been closing off vast areas of southeastern Utah because O’sputternik told them to.
Heres the money line: The U.S. contributes only $2.3 million to the IPCC. Our $2.3 million contribution leverages a global science assessment with global outreach and global technical input – a process we could not carry out alone and one that could come to a halt without U.S. support.
So, on one hand, the US pays ONLY 2.3 mill, but on the other, this process could COME TO A HALT WITHOUT US SUPPORT
I think that this is further proof that the people backing the IPCC and everything green are stupid.