Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Recent Comments
saveenergy on Cattle And The Climate gelcarrion0t on New Video : Analyzing Oil And… saveenergy on Is Antarctica Melting? saveenergy on 65 Years Of Progress! Jeff L. on Analyzing The Western Water Cr… Morgan Wright on Great Lakes Approaching 100% I… Morgan Wright on Great Lakes Set Another Spring… gelcarrion0t on New Visitech Features saveenergy on Ice-Free Arctic By 2014 gelcarrion0t on Ice-Free Arctic By 2014
It’s a shame I’m not in a climate related field (or university course); I’d like to be funded to study something already well established in human knowledge.
I’m just perplexed that csmonitor consider this as being something new; it is basic high school science.
Here’s another funny quote from the article…….”In some ways, he suggests, the study’s main value may rest in the model shortcomings it may reveal – shortcomings “that may limit our current ability” to provide credible evidence of a link between global warming and the extreme rain and snowfall.”
Really?
An example of poor journalism……..”Either something is wrong with the models and they’re not getting the magnitude of the extremes observed,” Dr. Held says, identifying global warming as a culprit “may be suspect because something is going on” in the climate system that the models aren’t capturing.”
There is a word missing from that quote. Indeed, at the very minimum an entire clause. Is it wrong to hate warmistas that intentionally leave out information?
To answer my own question, “hate the sin, but” blather, bs, blather, bs, blather, “sinner”.
En la mañana.
This is what I call intelligent reporting…. for morons.
The study released after the fact to let you know they were smart enough to know ahead of time it could be caused by manmade global warming.
;O)
Huge surprise, wait for them to start denying they ever said CAGW will cause droughts.