Boundless Evidence That Climate Science Is A Criminal Profession

Stephan Lewandowsky of the University of Bristol, says there is no evidence for a global warming hiatus.


No substantive evidence for ‘pause’ in global warming, study finds

NOAA reported the hiatus. NASA reported the hiatus. CRU reported the hiatus.


All of the most recent satellite data sets report the hiatus.



NOAA Radiosonde data reported the hiatus.


The only evidence that a hiatus didn’t occur is the most recent NOAA/NASA data, which is being investigated by Congress after whistleblowers came forward to report political manipulation and improper procedures.

The hubris of climate criminals like Lewandowsky seems to grow by the day, buoyed by the criminal in the White House.

About Tony Heller

Just having fun
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

72 Responses to Boundless Evidence That Climate Science Is A Criminal Profession

  1. Gail Combs says:

    Criminal? How about accessory to murder before the fact?

    This is the thousands killed by alarmist in the tiny country of the United Kingdom.
    2010 Pensioners burn books for warmth

    Tuesday 5 Jan 2010
    ….Temperatures this week are forecast to plummet as low as -13ºC in the Scottish Highlands, with the mercury falling to -6ºC in London, -5ºC in Birmingham and -7ºC in Manchester as one of the coldest winters in years continues to bite…
    A 500g book can sell for as little as 5p, while a 20kg bag of coal costs £5.

    Since January 2008, gas bills have risen 40 per cent and electricity prices 20 per cent, although people over 60 are entitled to a winter fuel allowance of between £125 and £400.

    Jonathan Stearn, energy expert for Consumer Focus, said: ‘If pensioners are taking such desperate measures to heat their homes it is shocking….

    Ruth Davison, of the National Housing Federation, said: ‘The spiralling cost of energy means heating homes has become a luxury rather than a necessity for many people….

    2011 Almost 3,000 people die each year as a result of fuel poverty, inquiry finds

    2012 Fuel poverty deaths three times higher than government estimates

    …the latest Office of National Statistics figures show that there were 25,700 excess winter deaths in England and Wales in winter 2010.

    Meanwhile the latest WHO research suggests that 30 to 40 per cent of the excess winter deaths can be attributed to fuel poverty….
    “The 2,700 figure published by Professor Hills is peculiar. I see no justification for it,” said Professor Liddell.

    “I believe the figure of 7,800 is much more realistic as it is based on WHO’s most recent estimates of deaths relating to cold and damp homes.”

    2013 UK Suffers Coldest March in 50 Years, Global Warming to BlameInside Every Liberal Is A Totalitarian Screaming To Get Out (I really like that motto.)

    “….About 2,000 extra deaths were registered in just the first two weeks of March compared with the average for the same period over the past five years….”

    Note that the goal posts have been moved and they are comparing extra deaths to a year that already had extra deaths due to fuel poverty. (see top article)

    2014/15 Winter death toll ‘to exceed 40,000’

    …“Excess winter deaths look like rising above the exceptional 2008-09 total and potentially reaching above 40,000…

    Professor Dame Sally Davies, the Department of Health’s chief medical office… wrote in Public Health England’s Cold Weather Plan for England 2014-15: “Excess deaths are not just deaths of those who would have died anyway in the next few weeks or months due to illness or old age.

    “There is strong evidence some of these deaths are indeed “extra” and are related to cold temperatures, living in cold homes as well as infectious diseases such as influenza.”

    ….“It’s a shocking fact that this winter, one older person could die every seven minutes from the cold. Yet with just under one million older people living in fuel poverty, many simply cannot afford to heat their homes to a temperature high enough to keep warm and well….

    2015 Death toll soars as cold snap hits UK

    …More than 25,000 people aged over 65 lost their lives due to the cold snap. 11,102 men and 14,129 women lost their lives in the fortnight to 23 January. The death toll among the elderly was 18,154 in the same period last year.

    Again they moved the goal posts.

    And then there is starvation:

    • Mark Luhman says:

      To top that off the leftist want to outlaw air conditioning, i just wonder when the people in this world will learn leftist kill, leftist philosophy is the leading cause on unnatural death in all of history.

      • Gail Combs says:

        The left (Fabian Socialist types anyway) have always been Neo-Malthusians and Eugenicists. Notice Paul R. Ehrlich, one of the most prominent neo-Malthusians since the publication of The Population Bomb in 1968, is a professor at Stanford University and his co-writer is Obama’s Science Czar. Note the “prestigious institutions such as Harvard, Yale and Stanford in the United States” were pushing eugenics just a few decades before.

        And if you think eugenics has died out, think again. Now it has morphed into ‘Over population’
        2004 Why is The Royal Society Hosting a Pro-Eugenics Conference?

        Secretary Clinton “In Awe” of Racist Eugenicist Margaret Sanger

        Dr Tim Ball Overpopulation: The Fallacy behind the Fallacy of Global Warming

        How eugenics poisoned the welfare state: A century ago many leading leftists subscribed to the vile pseudo-science of eugenics, writes Dennis Sewell, and the influence of that thinking can still be seen today

        …Most accounts of the origin of Britain’s welfare state begin with the Minority Report of the Royal Commission on the Poor Laws, drafted by Sidney and Beatrice Webb during the first decade of the 20th century. Beneath their seemingly compassionate rhetoric, the founders of the Fabian Society were snobbish, elitist and harboured a savage contempt for the poorest of the poor. Both husband and wife were enthusiastic supporters of the eugenics movement, which held that most of the behavioural traits that led to poverty were inherited….

        And then you get into Julian Huxley. From WIKI and other sources. link
        Huxley was a founding member of the World Wildlife Fund and the first President of the British Humanist Association. In 1959 he received a Special Award of the Lasker Foundation in the category Planned Parenthood – World Population. Huxley was a prominent member of the British Eugenics Society and its president from 1959–1962.
        His brother Aldous Huxley wrote Brave New World and corresponded with George Orwell while Orwell was writing 1984. (It would seem both became disillusioned with socialism and eugenics.) While at Eton, Orwell was taught French by Aldous Huxley, it was here they became friends. It was Huxley who introduced Orwell to the Fabian Society.

        The Life and Legacy of Julian Huxley

        Over the course of his lifetime, Julian Huxley developed a multifaceted position regarding eugenics, the applied science of improving the genetic composition of the human population. Eugenicists sought to achieve this goal through both encouraging reproduction among fit individuals and discouraging breeding among unfit populations…

        Huxley was not particularly concerned with the specifics of how short-range eugenics were implemented, so long as degenerate individuals were stopped from reproducing as quickly as possible….

        “UNESCO: Its Purpose and Its Philosophy” (1946)
        After becoming the first director-general of the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization in 1945, Huxley published “UNESCO: Its Purpose and Its Philosophy.” This manifesto outlined both the broad goals of this newly established organization and Huxley’s stance on how UNESCO should attempt to address them. More telling, however, was the degree to which Huxley’s publication reflected his views on eugenics….

    • markstoval says:

      Criminal? How about accessory to murder before the fact? ~ Gail

      I think you would also have them on murder as the leaders of a large murder plot. There is no way to claim that they did not know the plot to force UK poor to “heat or eat” would not lead to the sickly and the elderly dying before their time. In fact, I think you have the motive — they think people dying early is a good thing.

      The greens are a horror. I think worldwide they may have done more damage to the poor than even Stalin managed to do. (a very high bar indeed)

      • gator69 says:

        “Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron’s cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end for they do so with the approval of their own conscience. They may be more likely to go to Heaven yet at the same time likelier to make a Hell of earth. This very kindness stings with intolerable insult. To be “cured” against one’s will and cured of states which we may not regard as disease is to be put on a level of those who have not yet reached the age of reason or those who never will; to be classed with infants, imbeciles, and domestic animals.”
        – CS Lewis

      • Gail Combs says:

        Mark, I am looking at From a Race of Masters to a Master Race: 1948 To 1848 on Google.

        It is a real eye-opener.

        (Starting about page 250)
        The eugenicists (and Fabians like Winston Churchill) in the USA, UK and Scandinavia were openly speaking of eradicating between 5% and 15% of the population. This also includes one of Hitler’s heroes Henry Ford. In other words it was a popular belief.

        …Furthermore, it must be remembered that the most respected philosophers and political thinkers of the era had an open and well-documented contempt for “compassion” and the traditional sentimentality of religion. The moral hardening that “Mein Kampf” called for was in vogue…. One can look at H.G. Wells various eugenic and socialist utopias and find too many commonalities with National Socialism to ignore. One can only look at Fabian Socialist politics, namely those extrapolated by eugenicist Leonard Darwin, and see the Third Reich’s “nationalization” of industry. Most importantly, the “nationalized’ form of “socialism” had already been made a popular goal by Edward Bellamy, and implemented by Franklin D. Roosevelt in his New Deal policies. The leaders of the Allied countries, namely Winston Churchill and Woodrow Wilson, had both been intensely involved in legalizing the eugenics that called for segregation, sterilization, and eradication of entire swaths of the population. Their thoughts were backed up by prestigious institutions such as Harvard, Yale and Stanford in the United States, and several generations of the famous Darwin-Galton-Wedgwood family had dedicated their life’s work towards enacting eugenics in the United Kingdom…..

        The attacks on Christianity are nothing new either.

        …Nietzsche had written in 1882:
        “Sin is a Jewish feeling and a Jewish invention, and in view of this background to all Christian morality, Christianity was in fact out to “Jewify” the entire world.”

        ….This was the core message of “Mein Kampf.” This is what Adolf Hitler saw as the largest obstacle to its eugenic program. It was a Nietzchean rejection of Judeo-Christian compassion and Enlightenment egalitarianism which all mainline eugenicists shared….

        Staphle, Hitler’s official in charge of gassing facilities, when the killing of the handicapped accelerated, reprimanded Sautter teling him “‘Thou Shalt not kill’ is not a commandment of God at all but a Jewish invention”

        It was only thanks to Ike that the USA and the UK woke up from this madness (temporarily)

        page 253
        “The history of the Holocaust certainly points to the fact that without the photographs and film reels which General Eisenhower insisted upon, the collective revulsion at Hitler’s policies may not have happened.”

      • Gail Combs says:

        >”Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies….”

        Kent Clizbe a few days ago called the Fabians toothless blabbermouths. I find they more along the lines of “..omnipotent moral busybodies….”

        Guess who Hilary Clinton’s Heroine is? Secretary Clinton “In Awe” of Racist Eugenicist Margaret Sanger

        “Margaret’s English exile gave her the opportunity to make some critical interpersonal connections as well. Her bed became a veritable meeting place for the Fabian upper crust: H. G. Wells, George Bernard Shaw, Arnold Bennett, Arbuthnot Lane, and Norman Haire. And of course, it was then that she began her unusual and tempestuous affair with Havelock Ellis. Ellis was the iconoclastic grandfather of the Bohemian sexual revolution…he had provided the free love movement with much of its intellectual apologia.”

        On page 252 of that book I just cited:

        “….Churchill fell under the influence of Beatrice and Sidney Webb, the leaders of the fabian Society right around this time. At one of her famous strategic dinner parties, Beatrice Webb introduced Chirchill to a young protege, William Beveridge, the economist who would ultimately implement many of John Maynard Keynes’ Fabian economic polices once Churchill brought him into the Board of Trade. All of these Britons were devoted eugenicists…”

        Keynes and the Soviet Agent Harry Dexter White formed the IMF and World Bank at the Bretton Woods Conference. (July 1–22, 1944)

        Keynes was not technically a Fabian, but was Fabian socialist nevertheless

        …I agree that Keynes was NOT technically a Fabian (not being a formal member of the society).

        However, the Fabians did not want him in that role. He was more useful as an infiltrator into the liberal ranks. Keynes was very clever, and very political. He found it convenient to deceive. Despite the pretense of supporting the market (at times), he remained a strong socialist, and his philosophy not only arose FROM Fabian socialist philosophy, but was used as key reading by the Fabians. Apart from being on the closest terms (possible) with many key Fabians, he also lectured regularly at the Fabian Society.

        I’m citing a few extracts from the book Keynes at Harvard below. Most of these have formal citations which you can verify from the book. I’ve also added a few other references, to strengthen the argument.

        In sum, while Keynes was “technically” not a Fabian, he was through-and-through a Fabian in his ideas, approach, and legacy. He did more than anyone else to make Fabian socialist methods mainstream in the West. His achievements are many, including the Western welfare state, the “mixed’ economy and government intervention in business. Some of these ideas did well for a while, but these were not sustainable, and his ideas are now bringing great grief to the West.

        On the political spectrum of ideas, Keynes is PRECISELY a Fabian socialist. Technical membership of the society is, in my view, irrelevant, in arriving at this conclusion.

        For the “mixed’ economy and government intervention — see how Fascism has been renamed The Third Way. the E.M. Smith link discusses the various forms of economics.

        The Third Way ‘came from’ (was reconstituted) by Anthony Giddens, director of the London School of Economics, in his book “The Third Way: The Renewal of Social Democracy” It is supported by both Bill Clinton and Tony Blair (former Fabian Society Chair) who lecture at the LSE. Blair presided over the hanging of the Fabian Window at LSE and Bill Clinton was present at the occasion (again scrubbed from the internet.)

        Third Way is a Washington, D.C.-based public policy think tank founded in 2005 by former staffers who worked in the Clinton administration. The think tank develops policy ideas, conducts public opinion research and hosts issue briefings.

        David Rockefeller went to the London School of Economics:

        World Bank and IMF
        The Chase Bank has also had a strong connection to the World Bank, as three presidents (John J. McCloy, Eugene R. Black, Sr. and George Woods) all worked at Chase before taking up positions at the international bank. A fourth president, James D. Wolfensohn, is also closely associated with Rockefeller, serving as a director of the Rockefeller Foundation, amongst other family-created institutions.

        Rockefeller has also for many years hosted annual luncheons at the family’s Westchester County Pocantico estate for the world’s finance ministers and central bank governors, following the annual Washington meetings of the World Bank and International Monetary Fund. These luncheons were held at the Playhouse. These regular meetings were also attended by the other internationalist in the family, John D. Rockefeller III, until his death in 1978.

        Instead of eugenics and the attack on the Ten Commandments by calling them ‘Jewry’ We now have ‘Animal Rights’ (equating humans with animals) and CAGW/ sustainability. The basic plan is the same just the ‘hobgoblins’ for herding the masses have changed.

  2. Steve Case says:

    I agree, using food crops to produce automobile fuel is a crime against humanity.

    • Don says:

      Using fertile farmland to grow crops specifically engineered for fuel is a crime.

      • Gail Combs says:

        It is a much worse crime than a lot of people realize because corn is so tough on the soil. Corn is planted with a lot of space between plants and takes a lot of fertilizer. This means a lot of the soil (and fertilizer) ends up in the rivers and streams. My farm was an old tobacco farm. The soil survey showed it had well over 4 feet of the best loam in the county in the 1950s. By 1995 there was nothing left but clay. The soil was so poor they could not get a decent crop to grow so it was sold.

        By returning the crop fields to pasture I have managed to build up about 6 inches of top soil. (The monsoons wash away a lot of the ‘organic fertilizer’) This is why the vegan diet the USDA is now hawking is so idiotic and the farming practices coming out of the WTO/OIE/FOA are unsustainable. You NEED livestock to rest and replenish the soil. Also you can produce food on marginal land that is too steep or too rocky to grow crops.

        The academics these days are truly idiot savants.

  3. Steve Case says:

    Stephan Lewandowsky of the University of Bristol, says there is no evidence for a global warming hiatus.

    I really don’t give a rip about the so-called pause or hiatus. What really counts is the actual temperature. And after more than 25 years and a 40% increase to 400 ppm CO2, the actual temperature isn’t anywhere near what the climate models said it should be by now. The climate models are wrong, and any science based on those models is bunk.

    • Martin Smith says:

      The current global average temperature is actually right where the global climate models projected it would be:

      • Dave G says:

        Those aren’t temperatures… Those are anomalies….
        It’s easy to make the present look warmer when you are cooling the past. Which 1950 data are they starting from?
        Do you realize that 1880 to 1980 warming has nearly tripled since 1980. (After the fact).

        • Martin Smith says:

          Yes, Dave, anomalies are what we use in climate modelling.

        • AndyG55 says:

          We ????? WTF…. you have nothing to do with climate science.

          You cannot ever include yourself in climate science, you are a NOTHING… an empty space..

          You are a base-level ignoramus when it comes to climate science.. and have proved so on many occasions.

          Yet your arrogance outshines that ignorance.

        • When he says “we” he includes himself with the people who are paying him to visit this website, out of their Obamaclimate money.

      • AndyG55 says:

        BULLSH*T !!!

        You really do fall for the base-level LIES and PROPGANDA don’t you, little Goreboy…

        REAL DATA is hard for your to accept.

      • Latitude says:

        The current global average temperature is actually right where the global climate models projected it would be……..

        Martin, your chart is two years old

        • Martin Smith says:

          Yes, but, globally, the last two years have been the two warmest years on record. And 2015 will be even warmer.

        • Jason Calley says:

          “Yes, but, globally, the last two years have been the two warmest years on record. And 2015 will be even warmer.”

          Scientists have developed a special instrument for measuring temperatures. It is called a “thermometer.” Actual thermometer readings do not support your claim. Is it true that some self-styled “climate scientists” assert that the last two years were the warmest, but their assertion is based on ignoring the thermometer readings and substituting their own undocumented numbers instead of actual temperatures.

        • AndyG55 says:

          Globally the last two years HAVE NOT been the warmest, even in the short time period of the satellite data.

          Anything from GISS or HadCrut is a load of fraudulently adjusted nonsense and LIES.

          The REALITY is that the Erath is only just above the COLDEST PERIOD IN THE LAST 10,000 years.

          That is the REALITY that the little Goreboy cannot ever admit to.

      • Andy DC says:

        It is not hard to “”prove” a certain result when you start “adjusting” the raw data in the direction of the desired result. You are sadly confusing “proof” with propaganda.

        • Andy DC says:

          Definition of propaganda-Information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.

          By constantly warm biasing data in a systematic fashion, in order to arrive at a pre-determined conclusion, the alarmists are obviously engaging in propaganda, not proof!

      • AndyG55 says:

        Your continued use of SkS as a link PROVES that the ONLY thing you are interested in is PROPGANDA LIES and MISINFORMATION, that is all you will ever find on SkS.

        You really need to actually learn some REAL FACTS instead of relying on the total crap spewed out by those ignorant nonces.

        Oh, I forgot.. you run from REAL FACTS, because you know they will eventually break down your massive brain-washing and ignorance.

      • pmc47025 says:

        Jeez, another SkS cartoon link. Anyone with a brain can look at the graph posted in the article and realize the author is trying to shine a turd. The much inflated “measured” anomaly is greater than what, maybe the coolest 5% of model runs? Similar graph, different conclusion:

      • wizzum says:

        Actual or “adjusted” temperatures Martin?

        If they are adjusted, please show mew where the actual temperatures are displayed.

        You told me they were the other day.

  4. gator69 says:

    Marty says there is no evidence of fraud. But then Marty thinks the IPCC has identified and quantified all climate forcings, and that they have disproven natural variability.

    evidence noun ev·i·dence \ˈe-və-dən(t)s, -və-ˌden(t)s\
    1- something which shows that something else exists or is true

    2- a visible sign of something

    Poor Marty.

    • Steve Case says:

      That’s right, the evidence says the climate models are wrong.

    • Martin Smith says:

      No, I didn’t say that. I said Steven Goddard has not shown any evidence of fraud. Neither have any of you minions. And no, I don’t think the IPCC has identified all the climate forcings. The IPCC doesn’t actually do the science; the IPCC just gathers and publishes all the science. And no, I don’t claim that all the climate forcings have been found. However, we do know about the greenhouse forcings, and the current global temperature is consistent with the predicted effects of those forcings and the feedbacks they cause. OTH, you have no competing theory. You have no alternative cause or causes that can explain even most of the data, let alone all of it.

      • Dave G says:

        It’s not warming… You are a satellite data denier… Don’t you read the article? The only thing that is warming is the fudged surface temperature record.

        • Martin Smith says:

          Dave, the satellites don’t measure surface temperature. Nor do I deny satellite data (sic). However:
          One satellite data set is underestimating global warming

        • AndyG55 says:

          Wrong again Martin.

          UAH matches the rend of USCRN over the USA almost exactly..

          UAH is VERIFIED.. and thus the data extraction routines are VALIDATED.

          No-one in your little climate change cult understands that last word.

        • AndyG55 says:

          rend = trend.

          And Martin.. you have shown by the links you use that you have ABSOLUTELY NO INTEREST in learning anything REAL about climate and how it works.

          All you are interested in is the most base-level, bottom of the barre propaganda lies from SkS and similar. Its all you are capable of understanding.

          You are destined to be a climate ignoramus for the rest of your tedious, worthless, little life.

        • Martin Smith says:

          Andy, all the evidence that proves you are wrong is available from this analysis page:

        • AndyG55 says:

          Little Goreboy still hasn’t learnt enough to wake up to that FACT that SkS does NOT do facts……

          …. they do PROPAGANDA LIES and DECEIT, which is why the little Goreboy swallows it whole.

        • pmc47025 says:

          Once again, Martin sites SkS cartoons as PROOF! The linked SkS article is mostly a re-post of a Guardian article (incredible propaganda!). I held my nose and read it, main point is:
          “For instance, NOAA, Remote Sensing Systems (RSS), and the University of Alabama Huntsville (UAH). The problem is, their results don’t agree with each other.”

          Evidence that the differences are not significant, SkS article and Martin are wrong:

        • AndyG55 says:

          Because I know that REAL DATA is something that Martin the Goreboy runs away from in PANIC.. Lets look at the trends since 2005 over the one place in the world that has an proper UNTAINTED surface station record… that being USCRN in the USA.
          Let’s also add in the trend of “ClimDiv” from the USA.

          Trends in degrees Fahrenheit per year. (to 4 dp so we can differentiate.)

          UAH USA = +0.0038
          USCRN = +0,0035
          ClimDiv = -0.0199

          Remember that USCRN is the ONLY pristine evenly space and consistent surface data in the world.

          As we can see, UAH USA matches it almost exactly and in fact, UAH is actually running warmer that ClimDiv. !!

          So we again see using the ONLY pristine sample, that UAH is actually running a tiny bit HIGH..

          And we see that SkS are again LYING THROUGH THEIR AR*ES just like they always have.

          This pack of lying deceitful propagandist is who Marty the Goreboy chooses to reference… because he feels so much akin to them.

        • AndyG55 says:

          And lets not forget that UAH runs WARMER than RSS (run by warmist believers who are actually honest and haven’t corrupted the data)

          RSS over the USA has a trend of NEGATIVE 0.0302 F/year.

      • AndyG55 says:

        SG has shown MASSIVE evidence of fraud, you are just way to brain-washed to see it.

        Go crawl back under Al Gore crevice from whence you came. and stop LYING

        • Martin Smith says:

          Andy, Steven Goddard has not shown any evidence of fraud. He has not even shown any evidence that any adjustment to any dataset is incorrect.

        • AndyG55 says:

          Yes SG has shown MASSIVE EVIDENCE of unjustified data tampering to meet a political agenda.

          That is FRAUD..

          You can DENY that fact all you want…. but there is nothing that your worthless little propaganda lies and deceit can do about reality of that fact.

      • gator69 says:

        Once again, Marty lies…

        gator69 says:
        November 22, 2015 at 3:41 pm
        …And since you failed so misearbly the last time, let’s review some basic climate science again.
        1- List all climate forcings, order them from most to least effectual, and then quantify them all.
        2- Please provide even one peer reviewed paper that refutes natural variability as the cause of recent, or any, global climate changes.
        There is nothing unusual or unprecedented about our climate, or how we got here. For 4,500,000,000 years climates have always changed, naturally. This means there has been a set precedent, and the burden of proof falls on natural climate change deniers like yourself.

        Martin Smith says:
        November 22, 2015 at 3:48 pm
        Thank you for repeating your questions yet again, gator. Here is the answer to both of them yet again:

        gator69 says:
        November 22, 2015 at 4:03 pm
        You really should read links before posting them, because you posted the wrong link, again.
        If you believe the answer is in that link, you will need to attempt to show everyone where it is, because it isn’t there.
        Are you really as dumb as you pretend?

        Hello Marty!
        Where did you go? 😆
        I asked you once again to show me where in you silly IPCC link we can find answers to these…
        1- List all climate forcings, order them from most to least effectual, and then quantify them all.
        2- Please provide even one peer reviewed paper that refutes natural variability as the cause of recent, or any, global climate changes.
        There is nothing unusual or unprecedented about our climate, or how we got here. For 4,500,000,000 years climates have always changed, naturally. This means there has been a set precedent, and the burden of proof falls on natural climate change deniers like yourself.
        You wouldn’t be fibbin’, would you Marty? You can admit an honest mistake, can’t you?

  5. IPCC AR5 reported the hiatus/pause/lull/stasis in text box 9.2 and lamented the failure of the GCMs to model it.

  6. Steve Case says:

    My other tag line.

    If you can’t hit the broad side of a barn at twenty-five feet, you’re not going to hit the target at one hundered meters.

  7. NoMoreGore says:

    A Hiatus is a “pause”. In order for something to pause, it must resume. Claims of a Hiatus presumes a warming trend will resume. There is no certainty where the temps are going from here, so it really isn’t a hiatus. It is a period of insignificant trend – along an undetermined function comprised of an unknown number of concurrent processes of varying period and amplitude.

  8. AndyG55 says:


    Surely he is not still pretending to do science and statistics !!!!!

    His past attempts have been absolutely laughable.

    He is the CAGW agenda’s biggest clown.

    They should lock away his keyboard because of the damage he does to their cause.

    • Gail Combs says:

      I call him Loony Lew.

      Richard Tol (a sane warmist) went after the Kooky Kook paper.

      Environmental Research Letters came back with comments on my latest attempt to get something published about Cook’s 97% paper. They were much quicker this time, but as before they argue that critical debate is not something academics do. I kept my questions, see whether they survive another round of review.*

      Update (30 Oct 2015): Paper accepted.

      Anyway Tol had his run-ins with Loony Lew and the rest of the crew over the Cooked paper.

      LEWANDOWSKY, S. & COULTER, A. 2014b. 24 Critical Errors in Tol (2014) – Reaffirming the 97% consensus on anthropogenic global warming. Brisbane: SkepticalScience, University of Queensland.

      SEE: ERL does not want you to read this (Cook et al, 2013, Environmental Research Letters)

      In the REFERENCES this was mind boggling! COOK, J. 2014. Skeptical Science consensus paper voted ERL’s best article of 2013.

  9. AndyG55 says:

    A big minus to’s reputation that they still let Lewendopey post mindless tripe there, amongst the other mindless tripe.

  10. Rosco says:

    At least Australia is shot of this arrogant arsehole – if only Bristol would take Cook and SkepticalScience along with Flannery we could salvage some of the previous academic pride in Australia’s institutions.

  11. omanuel says:

    Please join the effort to reap the best possible harvest from the Paris Climate Conference: “A PEACEFUL AND UNANIMOUS CONCLUSION THAT BENEFITS ALL SOCIETY.”

  12. I miss Marty

    • AndyG55 says:

      In olden days, every village had a village idiot…

      …. just for the purpose of keeping people entertained with their stupidity.

      Marty served that purpose here. 🙂

  13. Dave Nottage says:

    In a few years, alarmists will be repeating the “no ice age scare” mantra, except this time it’ll be a “no hiatus reported” mantra.

    I’ll say it again: it’s extremely ironic that alarmists should use the “D” label.

    • AndyG55 says:

      They’ll also be saying.. ..

      “No, we meant that CO2 makes the planet get COOLER !!!”

      “We never said ‘global warming’!”

    • Gail Combs says:

      A characteristic of a criminal and a scam artist is the deliberate use of projection.

      If a new ‘friend’ says “He stole it!” chances are the new ‘friend’ is the light fingered person and not the person they accused.

      ClimAstrologists continually display this characteristic. We are accused of ‘denying’ the Science, being in the pay of big oil…

      They beat us to the punch each time transferring the actions they are making onto us and thereby keeping us from pointing out the truth. If we do try to point out the truth we look lame with our ‘he did it too’.

    • gator69 says:

      Only if you cherry pick the date of 1970.

      Were there no wildfires before 1970? If there were, isn’t this (outdated) study dishonest?

  14. cfgjd says:

    The sheep have have been deceived by corporate funding:

  15. Tonino says:

    Did NATO Just Attack Russia, Or Was It Climate Change’s Fault?

  16. Robertv says:

    If they just would stick to the science.

    Who said that the heat was hiding at the bottom of the oceans ?

  17. ClimateOtter says:

    Steve, don’t know if you will see this, but: What graphic do you know of which offers the Best representation of Earth’s temperatures since 1880, before all the adjustments made by NOAA, GISS and others?

  18. eliza says:

    Here we go what a coincidence
    and it shows nothing in fact its been cooling since 2000 and apparently the met office agrees

  19. omanuel says:

    There is no convincing evidence of AGW.

    Serious climatologists must go back to Aug 1945 and correct for confusion inserted into nuclear and solar physics after WWII in an unsuccessful attempt to stop proliferation of nuclear weapons

Leave a Reply