Arctic Ice Growth Continues To Blow Away All Records During NASA’s Hottest Year Ever

Government experts say that 2015 is the hottest year ever, despite the fact that all actual evidence shows that they are lying.

Arctic sea ice growth has been at record levels this year

2015-11-09-04-06-45 Ocean and Ice Services | Danmarks Meteorologiske Institut

Ice extent is far above 2006, the year with the highest minimum of the past decade.


Ice growth in Greenland has also been at unprecedented levels.


Greenland Ice Sheet Surface Mass Budget: DMI

The Greenland ice sheet has been experiencing record cold, to accompany the record ice growth



The Glacier Girl aircraft was found buried under 250 feet of ice and snow, 50 years after it crashed in Greenland. It accumulates about five feet of ice per year.


Despite the fact that all scientific evidence shows Greenland is not melting down, and that 2015 is not the hottest year ever – climate criminals pushing the White House agenda continue to lie about both.

About Tony Heller

Just having fun
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

45 Responses to Arctic Ice Growth Continues To Blow Away All Records During NASA’s Hottest Year Ever

  1. hskiprob says:

    It’s not just the White House, almost all the governments are pushing the fear mongering. Don’t you know, we need government to protect us. Just ask those that were in the World Trade Center buildings.

    The best definition ever for a politician; one who is willing to risk your life and freedom, to protect their own. If you look at the average Non Commissioned Officer, (NCO) in the military, they are from the lower 1/3 socio-economic percentile.

    • vorlath says:

      It’s because libs want bigger government. What would necessitate a bigger government more than a world catastrophe? They got a scare last time with the faux government shutdown. What if government shut down and no one noticed?

  2. The only thing we can be sure about with ice, is that in seemingly no time the trend will go the other way and then the Climate Extremists will be telling us this “proves” them right, and then in not much time after, it’ll have swung the other way … and we’ll be able to be smug yet again. And just we think we know it just swings back and forth – to prove us all wrong again … mother nature will now have an almighty long “pause” in Arctic ice levels.

    • Chaam Jamal says:

      climate science in a nutshell: “whatever happens was caused by fossil fuel emissions and will prove to be catastrophic and therefore the answer is to reduce emissions”

  3. gator69 says:

    Arctic ice sure is making a mockery of the “heat hiding in the oceans” notion, and the fraudulent adjustments to NOAA’s data set to erase the pause.

  4. Jason Calley says:

    Sarcasm toward CAGW enthusiasts follows:

    “Well, sure the ice is building up thicker on the SURFACE! Everyone knows that. The melting, the important part, is caused by CO2 from the atmosphere seeping UNDER the ice cap. The CO2 acts like a blanket and warms up the bottom of the ice sheet. THAT’S where it is melting, THAT’S why Greenland is losing all of its ice. After all, it is just simple high school physics!”

  5. gator69 says:

    The Arctic is extending to Flagstaff now…

    Flagstaff has record snow, another round may hit next week

  6. Martin Smith says:

    You are still using the wrong graph, Steven. This is the third or fourth blog post you have used the wrong graph. The correct graph shows that the current Arctic sea ice extent is more than one standard deviation below normal, so it is quite low. It might be increasing rapidly right now, because it is November; it is getting very cold up there in the Arctic Ocean. It does this every fall and winter. But the trend for Arctic sea ice extent over the last 35 years is down:

    • Frank K. says:

      Right on time… 🙂

      You know I just can’t get enough of this graph…being so full of truth and honesty. I may make some Christmas Cards for the holidays with this graph. “Happy Holidays – enjoy the record ice!”

      Time to sing…

      “You say the wrong graph, I say the right graph…let’s call the whole thing off…”


    • Martin puts his stupidity, poor reading skills and poor judgement on display here day after day.

      • Martin Smith says:

        And yet, even with my admitted stupidity, you are unable to support your erroneous claims when they are exposed. You are very good at attacking me personally, as are your minions, but you are still committing glaring error after glaring error expecting to get away with them. I don’t think it’s working.

        • wizzum says:

          Yep, definitely a death spiral in ice magnitude, as displayed by satellite immagery:

        • dave1billion says:


          I always wanted to be a minion.

          My father always told me that I was neither industrious enough nor evil enough to ever rise above the level of being a henchman,


        • hskiprob says:

          dave1billion – that was funny. Neither ambitious or evil enough. Sadly I think there is more truth in your fathers wisdom, than most realize.

        • Yeah, but will you tell him you are out of job?

        • Gail Combs says:


          Looks like the ice is already starting to form in the area of Hudson Bay in the 2015 illustration.

        • AndyG55 says:

          “even with my admitted stupidity”… You said it..

          And SG has supported all his factual claims, you just don’t have the intelligence to over-come your brain-washed ignorance and accept the facts.

          He is not making errors, and you have not shown one error that he has made.

          You are just making that up to try in vain to support your brain-dead, cultish religious beliefs.

        • dave1billion says:

          Luckily, minioning is seasonal work and evil never truly sleeps.

          I’ll probably get a job selling firearms and tobacco to pre-schoolers or just volunteer to support Donald Trump or Ben Carson.

        • Jason Calley says:

          The tobacco is not good for them but there is nothing wrong with selling weapons to children as long as they are responsible children and their parents allow it.

        • sam says:

          you havn’t exposed any erroneous claims, you just used a chart that goes back to 1980 instead of 2007. if he is cherry picking so are you. Then there’s the record ice in the antarctic in 2013, and the broke again in 2014 (the water under the ice is warm says the ipcc lyars) then there’s the increasing ice in greenland. The FACT is that since appox. 2000 the trend is more ice and more cold, less days that are over 100*F etc. The fact that most US southern weather stations show a cooling trend, even if you are able to show some graphs that show warming, you are certainly not able to link it to ‘co2’ the fact that there is just as much or more data showing cooling when co2 emissions are always increasing proves that the whole AGW theory is a load of bullshit. it has been exposed as bullshit just like the hockystick graph and the bullshit claims that now is hotter than the 1930s. The reality is that the PDO index is increasingly blowing cold and the solar cycles are crapping out and that is what is dominating climate not co2. every year that goes by this will become more obvious as we get closer to 2030 when the maunder minimum starts.

    • Menicholas says:

      Smitty! Welcome back laddy!
      Do you have any actual information yet, or are you here to treat us to more of the same warmed over nonsensical ranting as before?
      Honestly dude, you need some new material…didn’t any of the other comedians you hang with ever mention that the same jokes told over and over rarely get funnier with repeated telling?

    • AndyG55 says:

      No, SG is using the correct graph,

      The AMO has now switched, The Arctic sea ice CYCLE has bottomed out, and Arctic sea ice has started to increase, and will continue to increase for the next 30 or so years.

      Again you lack of understanding of understanding that the mean is based on the top part of the Arctic sea ice cycle shows just how mathematically illiterate and knowledge deprived you really are

      Also the refusal to understand or admit that, in the longer term, Arctic sea ice is actually anomalously high. For most of the first 3/4 of the Holocene an ice free summer Arctic was the normal. The only reason the current sea ice level is SO HIGH is because we are only just above the temperatures of the COLDEST period of the last 10,000 years.

      These are the facts that morons like you REFUSE TO ADMIT, because they make a total nonsense of your failing religion.

    • FTOP says:

      I guess I am confused. Are you arguing that DMI data is erroneous and the propaganda site Skeptical Science is trustworthy?

      Any link to Skeptical Science most likely proves the opposite of what it tries to defend.

    • catweazle666 says:

      “You are still using the wrong graph, Steven.”


      Stop lying.

  7. gator69 says:

    What makes 1980 a reasonable starting point for Arctic ice observations? I prefer the average of the past 9000 years, which shows Arctic ice is presently above average.

    Your 35 years versus my 9000 years. Which average is more meaningful?

  8. Martin Smith says:

    I’m sure it is fun for you to watch your minions come out to attack me and anyone else who points out your errors, but it doesn’t change the fact that your blog posts are pretty much always committing the same errors. If your goal is to convince people that AGW is not a problem for the human race, I can’t see how you can hope to achieve that with your blog posts, because they all contain the fundamental errors that I and others have exposed. Not that your errors are well hidden. They are pretty obvious. Of course your minions believe everything you write, but most of them don’t understand the subject.

    • Frank K. says:

      Martin you’re so precious when you’re angry… 😀

      • Martin Smith says:

        Thanks for the compliment, Frank, but like Steven’s own “About” Steven revelation above, I’m “Just having fun.”

        • Frank K. says:

          Martin – you REALLY need to lighten up, son. If you don’t like this blog, that’s OK. Go ahead and start your own blog and show us all (and the world) where you’re right and we’re wrong. No need to come here…

    • You project your errors on to other people. You believe you see errors, because you don’t think rationally.

      • Martin Smith says:

        Then it should be easy to show where I am wrong, but you don’t do that. In each case, I have shown why your claim is wrong, and I have provided proof. The best you have been able to do is to suddenly change your argument several times, but that hasn’t worked. The worst you have done is to descend to the level of your minions by attacking my character and intelligence. Your attacks say nothing about me. They say a lot about you.

        • pmc47025 says:

          “and I have provided proof”. That is hilarious. Steven, IMO, is very effective at showing EVIDENCE that a “CAGW signal” is not present in any current climate data set.

        • Daily news update, 8:28 MST:

          1. Speedy Smith drives by, claims micro-aggression
          2. Minions feel sorry for him
          3. Speedy Smith departs again
          4. Minions still jobless

        • gator69 says:

          Classic science says, “If observations do not match the predictions, the theory is rejected”.

          Climastrology (Fraud) says, “If observations do not match the predictions, change the observations”.

          Pretty simple to understand, if you are not an idiot.

        • AndyG55 says:

          You have not shown why any of SG’s claims are wrong.

          You have not provided any proof.

          You have fixated on one error of your own, and continued to follow that one error.

          Your inability to comprehend even the most basic data, says a whole lot about you

        • catweazle666 says:

          “Then it should be easy to show where I am wrong”

          It has been demonstrated to you that you are wrong by numerous posters on innumerable occasions.

          But like all flame trolls with a blatant agenda, you refuse to admit fault and keep churning out the same old lies time after time.

    • gator69 says:

      Are global warming skeptics simply ignorant about climate science?

      Not so, says a forthcoming paper in the journal Advances in Political Psychology by Yale Professor Dan Kahan. He finds that skeptics score about the same (in fact slightly better) on climate science questions.
      -Advances in Political Psychology by Yale Professor Dan Kahan

      A large survey of U.S. adults (N = 1540) found little support for this account. On the whole, the most scientifically literate and numerate subjects were slightly less likely, not more, to see climate change as a serious threat than the least scientifically literate and numerate ones.
      -Cultural Cognition Project Working Paper No. 89

    • Daily news roundup:

      1. Speedy Smith arrives, takes over the job of Goddard’s minions.

      2. Dog bites man.

      3. Millions of Goddard’s minions instantly jobless.

    • AndyG55 says:

      Sg is not in error, and you have not shown him to be in erro.

      You have produced easily falsified arguments and your blatant refusal/inability to recognise or accept real data shows just how brain-washed and ignorant you really are.

    • AndyG55 says:

      It is very obvious from your lack of knowledge and understanding about basically every facet of the climate, that you are working from a very low-level information base.

      Coma back in 10 years when you have learnt something, because your base level ignorance is shining through for all to see.

    • AndyG55 says:

      The ONLY error SG has made is posting facts and data that Martin doesn’t like and can’t accept.

      Martin has been proven to be WRONG at every turn, but doesn’t have the intelligence to understand that.

    • Andy DC says:

      Whatever ltiny bit of credibility you might have was destroyed when you insisted that Sandy was a “major hurricane” when it was nowhere close to the National Weather Service’s very own definiition of a major hurricane. You think by saying it is so makes it so? That has been your only argument so far.

Leave a Reply