NASA Has Nearly Doubled Global Warming By Data Tampering Since 2005

Posted on October 28, 2015 by Tony Heller

Almost half of claimed global warming is due to data tampering by NASA over the past 10 years.

NASA2005-2015Tampering
2005 version: Fig_A.pdf
2015 version: Fig.A.gif 

About Tony Heller

Just having fun
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

8 Responses to NASA Has Nearly Doubled Global Warming By Data Tampering Since 2005

  1. Centinel2012 says:
    October 28, 2015 at 10:58 am

    Reblogged this on Centinel2012 and commented:
    Have no doubt that this data manipulation is FACT — NASA once the premier agency of can do engineers and scientists is now nothing more than a Pravda and political engineering and science!

    Reply
  2. Jason Calley says:
    October 28, 2015 at 11:55 am

    Tony, thanks so much for the continuing posts and graphs here at your site. Like so many, I visit your blog daily and am continually educated here on the magnitude of the so-called “adjustments”. I just wanted to take a moment to give you a hearty thumbs up, and to urge regular readers to make a donation to your site. (I just did!) The “Donate” button is in the upper right area of the page. For all you out there (yes, I mean YOU) who come here often but do not support the effort, get off your butt and put something in the kitty. If you cannot spare $20 then give $10. If you cannot spare $10 then give $5 — or even $1. And if you cannot spare $1, then God bless you and at least leave a comment to give the man some moral support.

    There is the truth, and then there is what the sociopaths tell us. Thanks, Tony, for all your work in reminding us of the difference!

    Reply
  3. jfreed27 says:
    October 29, 2015 at 2:59 pm

    bogus claim you could never publish in a real journal.

    Reply
    • Jason Calley says:
      October 29, 2015 at 3:40 pm

      LOL! Bogus claim! This is my biggest laugh of the day!

      Jeezo Pete… read the graphs! Those two graphs are BOTH taken from NASA’s own web site; the 2005 is from the WayBackMachine’s archived copy and the 2015 graph is from the current NASA site!

      I swear, the CAGW zombies cannot even understand basic graphs. Maybe you flunked Physics for Poets in school.

      Reply
    • Neal S says:
      October 29, 2015 at 3:41 pm

      It seems you may be incapable of understanding. The links to both recent and older charts that came from NASA are given right below the animated combination chart.

      Reply
    • Gail Combs says:
      November 3, 2015 at 11:34 am

      I am going to repeat what Richard T. Fowler said since it fits you to a T.

      Actually, what they are really saying these days, when someone challenges them about it, is that warming causes cooling, and therefore when there’s dramatic cooling in some large regions, that’s because it’s been warming globally. In this way, they can start to try to knit together the two paradigms so that they were “not wrong” before, and thus the two paradigms can be united into one grand paradigm for climate.

      That paradigm essentially holds that all severe weather is an example of “climate change”, which supposedly began when man began burning industrial quantities of coal and petroleum in the 19th century, and got much worse since the 1980s and 1990s, the time when many of the most rabid exponents of the new paradigm were born and were therefore able to observe the severe weather.

      So the new paradigm is seen as part of a corpus of “received wisdom” that’s being passed on to those younger folks, to the effect that “If all of this severe weather today seems bad, that’s not an accident. We can remember a time when it wasn’t nearly this bad. Therefore, that proves to you that the bulk of the change is caused by something that came about within our lifetimes.”

      And since they’ve all been brainwashed to believe that industry is evil, the conclusion naturally follows that the “change” is caused by something industry has done within the lifetime of the Baby Boomer. And what has industry done in that time? Strongly increased CO2 emissions, of course.

      So in their sick minds, it all seems to fit together perfectly: ‘When our mentors were young, there was severe weather due to regional cooling, which was in turn due to minor amounts of global warming, which is visible on all these government graphs, even waaaayyyy back then in the 60s and 70s. But now, since we, the children of that generation, have taken the reigns, the CO2 has skyrocketed, therefore the warming has skyrocketed, therefore the localized cooling has skyrocketed, therefore the intensity and frequency of severe weather has skyrocketed.’

      Thus, in their minds, they’ve got it all worked out, and it all seems to fit together perfectly! So any minor glitches in the evidence are written off, because (since the overall paradigm works so perfectly), there simply must be a reasonable explanation for the glitches, and an explanation that’s consistent with the paradigm.

      And the assumption is made that these explanations will eventually come to light, when some OCD egghead delves deeper into it. But until then …

      ‘We have a world to save, so we’ll leave the tying up of all the loose ends to the lesser folks within our movement, and we won’t lose sleep over it. There is simply no question that the theory true; it has already been proven beyond the shadow of a doubt, in myriad infallible ways, and therefore it is no longer subject to doubt. Now is the time for action, not prevarication.’

      So in this way, the attitude develops, which we’ve been seeing, of ‘shoot first and ask questions later’ … both in terms of a hyper-aggressive public policy stance, and of the half-baked arguments they advance when debating the “science”. — RT

      You are going to make the new Aristocracy the perfect slave since you agree that your life should be nasty, brutal and short with none of the perks from the industrial revolution to ease your lifestyle. This Sam Adams quote is appropriate since it is the same elite Aristocracy that is fashioning the new chains for Americans that you are so eager to wear. (Second link naming names.)

      ” If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom — go from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or your arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains set lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen.” – Sam Adams

      Reply
  4. Hifast says:
    November 6, 2015 at 9:31 pm

    Reblogged this on Climate Collections.

    Reply

Leave a Reply