More than 100 years ago, the father of global warming was saying the same mindless BS we hear now. Millions of people moving to Antarctica, Canada getting hot, blah, blah, blah blah. The only difference is that he thought it was a good thing.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Recent Comments
gelcarrion0t on Australia Permanent Drought Up… gelcarrion0t on “New computer modeling… Morgan Wright on Climate Destroying Shrimp Christopher Simpson on 1896 : Japan Hit By Earthquake… energywise on What’s At Stake? Robert Cherba on Too Hot To Live gelcarrion0t on Too Hot To Live Nicholas McGinley on “The world began to end… Nicholas McGinley on “The world began to end… Nicholas McGinley on “The world began to end…
Just you wait! Another hundred years or so, and then, another slimebucket from the shallow end of the gene pool will make another lame as prediction about climate change.
The other, and perhaps more important, difference is that he wasn’t trying to bilk trillions of dollars out of taxpayers’ pockets and foist a Marxist dystopia on everyone.
What a find this is Tony! What a comment on “basic science established for more than a century”.
Like a second marriage “a triumph of hope over experience” this is a triumph of extrapolation over reason. Its also a caution about over hyping CO2 increase in “greening the world”. I don’t suppose the figs in Chicago will be any less crappy than those I grow in London! There is a long way to go before “Antarctica is the only inhabitable continent”.
Funny how the warmest camp over on the left glosses over the father of CO2 and his theories of:
Child Electrocution
http://www.climatedepot.com/2013/12/20/electrified-children-1911-the-father-of-global-warming-prof-svante-arrhenius-thought-exposing-children-to-electricity-would-make-them-smarter/
Pre-Nazi Eugenics
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Statens_institut_för_rasbiologi
I guess calling a AGW supporter a Nazi sympathizer would be similar to the “denier” label, except more accurate.
As it happens, exposing children to electricity has made them smarter. Now, the little blighters can operate a computer by 3 years of age, absorb vast amounts of information by sitting for hours in their nappies watching PlaysKool on the TV, Who said this:: “your 8 year old daughter will have absorbed more information already than her grandfather did in his entire life”? Exposure to electricity, but not in the way the professor thought.
Arrhenius? I hate this guy. He’s the one too lazy to read Boyle or Charles or Clapeyron (and many others) and because he didn’t understand Gas Law (which had been around for 70 years) he’s responsible for the asinine “greenhouse” theory that confuses normally intelligent people by making them think a gas mix in a gravity gradient staying at equilibrium (otherwise known as lapse rate) somehow acts like some energy creating glass building that’s gonna incinerate all of us… right after we’re taxed to death.
Niel, You do not hate him have as much as the plants do.
http://fc07.deviantart.net/images/i/2003/3/0/9/Attack_of_the_Man_Eating_Plant.jpg
Gail: IMPORTANT !!!
I emailed Will Happer this morning and he sent me a copy of the slides he used at the lecture you were at.
My email address is darrylb@hickorytech.net. If you want me to forward his reply and the attached slides just email me. (or anyone else can email me if they wish)
Darryl
Thanks Darryl
I will get back to you when my computer quits hiccuping and the internet quits switching on and off.
Feed me Seymore! Feed Me!
I am sure we could find lots to feed to it. {:>D
Everything old is new again.
At least 100 years ago, the climate crackpots weren’t being paid billions for their crackpot research and they were not trying to communize the world.
The crackpots are still at it…
http://www.gizmag.com/nasa-drought-study-united-states/36128/?utm_source=Gizmag+Subscribers&utm_campaign=9a2fc40689-UA-2235360-4&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_65b67362bd-9a2fc40689-91342409
Comments are running heavily against CAGW.
Not only are they running against but the commenters know what they are talking about
Gizmag is pretty much an eye-candy site for tech addicts and engineers like me. I was favorably impressed by the push-back and you know, I am noticing (heck maybe it’s just me…) a fair amount of push-back on various technical sites on a variety of topics all seeming to fall under the rubric of “science-by-press-release” regardless of topic. It’s about time.
Looks like FDA is full of BS too http://www.slate.com/articles/health_and_science/science/2015/02/fda_inspections_fraud_fabrication_and_scientific_misconduct_are_hidden_from.single.html
A question for any of you experts out there…
I was led to believe that Arrhenius believed that space was “aether”, which he assumed would act as the “glass” does on a greenhouse.
But from this experiment………………….
The classic experiment that inspired Albert Einstein was performed in Cleveland by Albert Michelson and Edward Morley in 1887 and disproved the existence of an “ether” permeating space through which light was thought to move like a wave through water. What it also proved, said Hartmut Häffner, a UC Berkeley assistant professor of physics, is that space is isotropic and that light travels at the same speed up, down and sideways.
Is this reasonable and is it true??
Read all about the “Luminiferous Ether” here…
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luminiferous_aether
a very good find, Steven … as good as the “pall mall gazette” …
plus que ça change, plus que ça reste la même chose … 🙂
your being “rather proficient with computers”, is this your own searching algorithm ? … or … what are the actual words you put into google to find these ? … care to share ? … 🙂