http://www.woodfortrees.org/plot/rss/from:1997/plot/rss/from:1997/trend
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Global Boiling Day 125
- Terrifying Proof Of Global Warming
- Popular Science : China’s Electricity To Be One Third Renewable By 2025
- “You can get people to say anything”
- Crashing The Climate
- Groups Who Endanger You
- “How did humans get to the brink of crashing climate?”
- “Preparing the world for a new Ice Age”
- Denying Scientific Principles
- Sea Level Rise At New York
- Freezing Canada
- Climate Scamsters Slip Up
- Rapidly Increasing Sea Level
- Thing Of The Past Returns
- “a dangerous corruption of science”
- The World Doesn’t Care About The Climate Scam
- Rapidly Increasing Sea Level
- Fossil Fuels Saved The Whales
- “Unvaccinated footballers are putting lives at risk”
- CO2 Correlation
- The End Of Fossil Fuels
- Paid To Produce Gibberish
- UN Says We Have To Act Immediately On Climate
- Record Heat And Drought Produces Record Corn Crop
- Donald Trump’s Policies To Drown His Home
Email Subscription
Join 1,908 other subscribersRecent Comments
Morgan Wright on Freezing Canada saveenergy on Leon Heller’s Doctoral T… daveburton on Leon Heller’s Doctoral T… JapanT on “dozens of former intel… Morgan Wright on Fleeing Desperate Circumstance… Frank Stagg on 100% Wind By 2030 Eric Barnes on “dozens of former intel… Disillusioned on Censorship Industrial Complex Disillusioned on Censorship Industrial Complex willys36 on Censorship Industrial Complex
Here’s another dating from 1910 that Homer and Gavin forgot to fix:
http://data.giss.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/gistemp/show_station.cgi?id=614028360000&dt=1&ds=14
Here is another one in North Carolina
http://data.giss.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/gistemp/show_station.cgi?id=425003126350&dt=1&ds=14
Poulation: < 10,000
lack of warming is not proof of warming
That sounds self-evident, right? It shouldn’t take an Einstein. Or a rocket scientist. Maybe a climate scientist, though. Ok, what about cooling, not a lack of warming, but actual cooling, does the cooling prove warming? No. Well then, what about super cooling? I mean, what if it’s really super duper freezing, does the freezing prove warming? Actually, according to climate scientists, yes.
I’ve found that I like the skeptic blog of commenter Wagathon, and here’s an excerpt from one of his recent posts: [speaking about educational indoctrination] If you want to know if your child is getting a proper education, ask the teachers in the local school if the coldest winter in Chicago history is proof of global warming. Where do you move when they say, Yes! Their ‘yes’ vote means that educators in your school believe in the subjective element over the objective — that the role of instinct trumps scientific practice. Their ‘yes’ vote means science is dead because, as Dr. Roger A. Pielke, Sr., reminds us, Science needs to advance by following the scientific method. This needs to be independent of culture or any other external influence.
http://evilincandescentbulb.wordpress.com/2014/04/07/proof-of-global-warming-alas/
Tweet from the Minnesota Twins: Today’s first pitch temp of 31° marks the coldest outdoor #MNTwins game ever played in Minnesota including Target Field and Met Stadium.
… EVER …
but that’s just weather, right? If it had been the hottest, then that would be “climate change”.
Saw this link over at WUWT – http://www.geoclimate.se/articles/20131107_GISS_Wibjorn_Karlen.pdf
Worth your time I believe.
Wow. I have been wondering what others in the non-Anglo world think about these so-called quality control adjustments.
Looks like they are a lot more about “control” than “quality”.
It definitely is. A nice corroboration of postings on this site.