sea level rise of many meters should be anticipated with the global warming of at least several degrees Celsius that is expected under business-as-usual (BAU) climate scenarios
www.columbia.edu/~jeh1/mailings/2011/20110118_MilankovicPaper.pdf
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Recent Comments
Nemo1948 on Bullseye! saveenergy on Cattle And The Climate gelcarrion0t on New Video : Analyzing Oil And… saveenergy on Is Antarctica Melting? saveenergy on 65 Years Of Progress! Jeff L. on Analyzing The Western Water Cr… Morgan Wright on Great Lakes Approaching 100% I… Morgan Wright on Great Lakes Set Another Spring… gelcarrion0t on New Visitech Features saveenergy on Ice-Free Arctic By 2014
Besides the links you provide we have some people who dug in the data and who performed an amazing job to proof AGW is a SCAM: Anthony Watts Surface Stations Project that shows that the entire temperature increase over the past decades is smaller than the error margin of the individual surface stations.
We had ClimateGate a giant e-mail and data leak providing inside information that tells us AGW IS A SCAM and we have the work from E. M. Smith who performed an incredible job perfectly presented in an interview between Coleman and E. M. Smith:
Anthony Watts Surface Statiion Project, The ClimateGate data links and interviews like the one with Smith should have a permanent presence at any skeptical web site because it is human nature to forget really bad things that happened very quickly. So we continue to invent the wheel for second, the third and the fourth time. And that brings us in a situation where we have an article from Dr. Ira Glickstein at WUWT telling is Global Warming is Real but not a big deal.
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2014/01/12/global-warming-is-real-but-not-a-big-deal-2/
I think an article like that is a smack in the face of those who already know AGW is the biggest pile of hog wash ever.
For those skeptics who are aroun for some time now refresh your memory and for those who are relative new to the subject, watch these two video’s and tell me if AGW is real or not:
http://www.kusi.com/story/13257664/full-unedited-interview-with-e-michael-smith#
Anyone who thinks that CAGW is not a scam (and by that I mean that it is not merely erroneous, but is consciously fraudulent) should go to E.M.s blog and read his analysis of how GIStemp works.
http://chiefio.wordpress.com/gistemp/
By the way, I am making no claim as to what Mr. Smith’s opinion is or is not, as far as fraud vs human error. I only say that his analysis can stand on its own merits.
If you generate the numbers necessary to reproduce Hansen’s red curve found in
Figure 7 Page 14 of
Paleoclimate Implications for Human-Made Climate Change – Hansen/Sato (DATE?)
that you linked to, you will find that those last numbers that represent December 2099 show sea level rise going up at the astonishing rate of 1 mm/day.
How can anyone believe this stuff?
The series I generated starts with:
2000 ; 4.88
2001 ; 5.23
2002 ; 5.6
2003 ; 6.01
and ends with:
2097 ; 4061
2098 ; 4352
2099 ; 4665
2100 ; 5000