NASA Has Nearly Doubled Their Reported Global Warming Over The Last 13 Years

The graph below shows global land temperatures 2001 version (red) and 2013 version (blue) normalized to 1998. By massively cooling the past in their recent graphs, they report nearly double the amount of 1880-2000 global warming as they did 13 years ago.

ScreenHunter_836 Dec. 25 14.38

Current version :  Fig.A.gif (656×446)

2001 version : NASA Goddard Institute: Surface Temperature: Graphs

About Tony Heller

Just having fun
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

13 Responses to NASA Has Nearly Doubled Their Reported Global Warming Over The Last 13 Years

  1. omanuel says:

    Thanks, Steven, for letting the world know what they get in return for all the funds given to NASA.

    I hate to see NASA destroy itself. A lot of innocent folks will be hurt, but there is nothing you can do to help those addicted to deception.


  2. omanuel says:

    For the rest of society,

    Merry Christmas and best wishes to you and yours for the New Year.

    Your gift is in the last paragraph of Francis William Aston’s Nobel Lecture on 12 Dec1922:

    “Powers beyond the dreams of scientific fiction.”

    That is yours if you can answer two questions from 1945-46:

    May the Force be with you,
    – Oliver

    • darrylb says:

      Omanuel—Merry Christmas,
      You have been consistently and tirelessly creating awareness of the above, so the least I can do is start to look at it in depth.
      Just a few notes. since you mentioned Dalton, who formed a very fundamental he was a humble school teacher with a grand vision.
      Two, please check out what I mentioned below, I am going to start needing assistance on a lonely stage. I sometimes comment, and see your comments at Climate etc, and WUWT,
      both IMO are excellent.

  3. Traitor In Chief says:

    It would appear that “adjustments” were well underway before 2001. It looks like the red line was already fraudulent. It’s just gotten worse.

  4. So, now there has been warming in the past decade? Previous charts show no warming since 1998 now look again. Unbelievable.

  5. Chewer says:

    They’re just keeping the dream alive, albeit in a rather twisted way 😉

  6. darrylb says:

    Just to be sure, I checked the vertical distances between values on the ordinate of the graph.
    They are consistent, unlike little tricks at skeptical science that Dana N. likes to pull.
    Just confirming Steve’s conclusion.
    I believe Tom Karl was the first to make all adjustments, except accepting the one for Heat island effect.
    I have countered proclamations in public meetings. (at colleges or universities). Most admit that high temps were higher during the thirties. But values given are averages to which they make adjustments. The adjustments made in low (night) temps) are do to time of day, instrumental quality and the belief that night temps are currently higher due to water vapor feedback (The whole crux of the argument.)
    However,satellite records and other records generally do not show an increasing relative or absolute humidity. When I present that information, I get silence, followed by some acknowledgement of being a denier.
    Perhaps Steve might like to present the relative humidity record, It is one of the final arguments of the AGW team.
    Again, STEVE, I made a copy of this, Got to acknowledge you in many different venues

  7. hazze says:

    NASA must be crowded with honest men…are they nuderd ? Why dont they kick these folks outta there ?

  8. Andy DC says:

    It isn’t hard to say that “it’s worse than we thought”, when they have license to jack around with the data in this manner.

    • omanuel says:

      To understand NASA, you need to understand that the US NAS (the United States National Academy) controls it’s budget and uses that to prevent ordinary folks from knowing that a variable star (Sol) with an iron-rich interior and a pulsar core:

      1. Made every atom in the solar system

      2. Birthed the solar system five billion years (5 Ga ) ago

      3. The heterogeneous supernova debris condensed into a planetary system that retained chemical and isotopic gradients of the original star.

      [4. That is why a cross-section of Earth or a cross-section of the whole planetary system resembles a cross section of a pre-supernova star: Iron in the center, silicate mantles and outer layers rich in H, C, N ]

      5. NASA and NAS have replaced the Inquisition and the Catholic Church at the start of the scientific revolution, the pair that almost succeeded in prosecuting Galileo for heresay.

      Oliver K. Manuel

  9. omanuel says:

    The US NAS (the United States National Academy) controls the budgets of other federal research agencies, like the US DOE (Department of Energy).

    NAS’ control over budgets of NASA and DOE promotes two falsehoods:

    1. The standard solar model of H-filled stars, and

    2. The standard model of “nuclear binding energy.”

    1. In March 2001, the solar neutrino puzzle was solved with experimental measurements that confirmed the Sun’s iron-rich mantle [1] and pulsar core [2].

    In August 2001, DOE lined up 178 co-investigators alphabetically to report [3] solar neutrinos oscillate away before reaching the detectors.

    2. In 1995 NASA hid experimental data [4] from the Galileo probe of Jupiter that confirmed the iron-rich Sun [1].


    1. O. K. Manuel and Golden Hwaung, “Solar abundances of the elements,” Meteoritics 18, 209-222 (1983):

    2. O. Manuel, C. Bolton, M. Zhong & P. Jangam, “The Sun’s origin, composition and source of energy,” 32nd Lunar & Planetary Science Conference, 1041 (March 2001)

    3. Ahmad, (176 co-authors) and Yeh, Physical Review Letters 87 (13 Aug 2001)

    4. CSPAN News: NASA Hid Data

    Oliver K. Manuel

Leave a Reply