The animation below shows the changes from JAXA V1 to V2. Note how the 1980s minimum hardly changed at all, but more recent minimums have been increasingly reduced over time, particularly the last four years where they have made large reductions in ice extent. Hansen must be proud.
 | Jeff L. on Analyzing The Western Water Cr… |
 | Morgan Wright on Great Lakes Approaching 100% I… |
| Morgan Wright on Great Lakes Set Another Spring… |
 | gelcarrion0t on New Visitech Features |
 | saveenergy on Ice-Free Arctic By 2014 |
| gelcarrion0t on Ice-Free Arctic By 2014 |
| gelcarrion0t on Debt-Free US Treasury Forecast |
| gelcarrion0t on Seventeen Years Of Fun |
 | Barbara Stockwell on Nuclear Safety In The US |
| saveenergy on 100% Tariffs On Chinese EV… |
At least they didn’t monkey around with the predictable endpoint of 2013, which tracks the 2008 “recovery” (not shown) with precision, and for the same (non-CO2 related & affected) reason!!!
new and improved….to show less ice
When they initiated the coastal algorithm, of course it’s going to show less ice…
They must have “adjusted” the past again to show that.
…so they lied again
The 1980s average max change is the big problem.
The article “North American moose dying at alarming rates” says “Winters have grown substantially shorter across much of the moose’s range”, “a longer fall with less snow”, and “when the temperature rises above 23 degrees Fahrenheit in winter, as has happened more often in recent years”. The link is: http://www.lasvegassun.com/news/2013/oct/24/north-american-moose-dying-alarming-rates-biologis/
Reblogged this on Edonurwayup's Blog.