“Anyone who claims that the debate is over and the conclusions are firm has a fundamentally unscientific approach to one of the most momentous issues of our time.”
– Solar physicist Dr. Pal Brekke, senior advisor to the Norwegian Space Centre in Oslo. Brekke has published more than 40 peer-reviewed scientific articles on the sun and solar interaction with the Earth.
“It is a blatant lie put forth in the media that makes it seem there is only a fringe of scientists who don’t buy into anthropogenic global warming.”
– U.S Government Atmospheric Scientist Stanley B. Goldenberg of the Hurricane Research Division of NOAA.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Recent Comments
saveenergy on Is Antarctica Melting? saveenergy on 65 Years Of Progress! Jeff L. on Analyzing The Western Water Cr… Morgan Wright on Great Lakes Approaching 100% I… Morgan Wright on Great Lakes Set Another Spring… gelcarrion0t on New Visitech Features saveenergy on Ice-Free Arctic By 2014 gelcarrion0t on Ice-Free Arctic By 2014 gelcarrion0t on Debt-Free US Treasury Forecast gelcarrion0t on Seventeen Years Of Fun
There was never any question about the Cook Nuccitelli paper being a lie. It was created for one purpose only. To give Obama a tweet.
“blatant lie”
I didn’t expect one of “them” to use the exact words that I do. Congratulations!
The UN should direct its energy towards ocean garbage, and forget about the CO2 thing. Ocean garbage dumping is disgusting and can actually be stopped. The CO2 thing can’t be stopped and doesn’t matter anyway because CO2 is not pollution. Throwing megatons of plastic into the oceans is
The 97% only applies to the guvmint employed scientists and the 3% will soon be let go.
Donk market research told them that the 97% thing was effective agitprop. All AGW related “studies” are made to order… Voila
You climate science denialist make a lot of noise and noise somehow denotes large numbers of people, but the fact remains that man made global warming is fact. Polls show that conservatives in large numbers also don’t accept the scientific fact of evolution. I wonder how many of the “scientist” on this Real Science site are creationist. And your Tea Party stuff is somehow supposed to be trusted with the reins of power.
First tobacco, and now evolution. You are completely irrational.
Your side denies evolution
http://stevengoddard.wordpress.com/2013/05/31/1859-shock-news-charles-darwin-said-that-dramatic-climate-change-was-essential-to-natural-selection/
Apparently you know religion, but do not know science. AGW is not a fact, not a theory and not even a testable hypothesis.
So enjoy your religion. At least we have the science.
“You climate science denialist make a lot of noise and noise somehow denotes large numbers of people, but the fact remains that man made global warming is fact.”
SCIENCE tells us that global mean temperature has been static for 16 years. Your fact fact is denialist.
Avery Harden,
Are all CAGW sceptics conservatives? (read this)
Did you know that religion is one of the driving forces behind John Cook’s ‘Skeptical Science’, one of the authors of the paper claiming 97%? By the way I am not a conservative, I reject Creationism and wholeheartedly embrace Darwinism.
The debate is not over, the science is not settled.
Nice try. Donks “in large numbers also don’t accept the scientific fact of evolution.”
Libz also seem to like to make declarations of fact without actually proffering proof, “man made global warming is fact.” Also probably the majority of the people that you refer to as denialists wouldn’t even argue that point, (I would) but it’s a LONG way to go from that to accepting the entire milleau of alarmism peddled as so-called climate change.
There’s a giant dump of “Thing of the past” due in the Cascades…
http://www.king5.com/news/local/Up-to-16-inches-of-snow-expect-to-fall-in-the-Cascades-225834261.html