Experts predicted a huge solar cycle.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- “wettest day on record”
- Scientific American Wants To “jeopardize rain and crops”
- October 14 Eclipse
- Not A Billion Dollar Disaster
- 1,039 New Coal Fired Power Plants
- Please Enter The Boxcar Peacefully
- Forecasting Climate Change
- The Miracle Of Life
- Toto’s Announcement
- The Safe Climate Of 1903
- The Manchurian Billionaire
- Left Wing Hero Of 2014
- Erasing The Hiatus
- Journalism Past Its Final Decades
- Assessing Government Climate Agencies
- Rapidly Changing Climate
- 100 Fifteen Minute Cities
- The World Began In 1981
- Some Carbon Is More Equal
- Dangerous Assault Rifle
- Climate Expert Zelensky
- Tropical Heat Of August/September 1895
- The Fake History Channel
- Reuters : Chinese Carbon Dioxide Is Different
- “What happened?”
Email Subscription
Join 1,923 other subscribersRecent Comments
Kent Clizbe on Scientific American Wants To… Morgan Wright on Scientific American Wants To… TimC on Please Enter The Boxcar Peacef… Disillusioned on Forecasting Climate Change Walter on 4-9 Degrees Warming At The Gre… Bob Greene on Dangerous Assault Rifle Morgan Wright on Scientists Are Alarmed vuurklip on Government To Save Us From Glo… Morgan Wright on Michael Mann Weighs In On Scie… Thomas Kirby on Michael Mann Weighs In On Scie…
So? CO2 controls Earth’s Temperature. Just ask Gavin.
Big decline in sunspots?
Decline! Again!
No worries, they are experts in hiding declines. Hell, they’re so good, they disappeared the entire MWP! Now that takes Mannpower.
Some experts (yes you NASA) predicted a huge cycle. Others may have been closer to the mark:
http://www.leif.org/research/Cycle%2024%20Smallest%20100%20years.pdf
Around the world, warm-mongers are praying that the Sun heats up. (Even although it “has nothing to do with the climate”…)
It’s all Bush’s fault!
Well, NASA may have made a slight typo on their 2009 prediction — uh, projection — uh, “scenario” — but their 2013 forecast is correct without a doubt. Notice that they already have proven themselves spot on with the 2000 to 2012 portion!
🙂
Looks like they underestimated the unemployment rate and overestimated the sunspot counts.
…and from the Times of India: “Solar Activity drops to 100-year low, puzzling scientists”
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/home/science/Solar-activity-drops-to-100-year-low-puzzling-scientists/articleshow/22719807.cms
Cycle 25 is going to knock their ‘global warming’ on its rear! These people HARDLY qualify as ‘scientists’ or anything of the sort!!!
http://www.landscheidt.info/
My paper “Are Uranus & Neptune Responsible for Solar Grand Minima and Solar Cycle Modulation?” is published in the peer reviewed journal (IJAA)
http://www.scirp.org/journal/Home.aspx?IssueID=3540#36513
To be clear the principles in the paper are very different to what Landscheidt laid out, SC24 is exactly on track as predicted first in 2008.
In a few years NOAA will go back and revise the numbers to say what they want them to.