I predict that the time will be exactly 2:43, twice during the next 24 hours.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Canada
- “we’ve lost control”
- “we’ve lost control”
- National Climate Assessment Math
- Net Zero Progress
- London Cancels Hanukkah
- Denying Scientific Principles (Part 2)
- Beam Me Up Scotty
- Denying Scientific Principles (Part 2)
- Captain Kirk Says CO2 Will Kill Us All Very Soon
- Irish Hate Crimes
- Burn Acreage Fraud In The 2023 National Climate Assessment
- CNN Wants Carbon Passports
- Burn Acreage Fraud In The 2023 National Climate Assessment
- Global Boiling Day 125
- Terrifying Proof Of Global Warming
- Popular Science : China’s Electricity To Be One Third Renewable By 2025
- “You can get people to say anything”
- Crashing The Climate
- Groups Who Endanger You
- “How did humans get to the brink of crashing climate?”
- “Preparing the world for a new Ice Age”
- Denying Scientific Principles
- Sea Level Rise At New York
- Freezing Canada
Email Subscription
Join 1,903 other subscribersRecent Comments
Morgan Wright on Captain Kirk Says CO2 Will Kil… saveenergy on Freezing Canada Morgan Wright on Freezing Canada saveenergy on Leon Heller’s Doctoral T… daveburton on Leon Heller’s Doctoral T… JapanT on “dozens of former intel… Morgan Wright on Fleeing Desperate Circumstance… Frank Stagg on 100% Wind By 2030 Eric Barnes on “dozens of former intel… Disillusioned on Censorship Industrial Complex
Did you adjust for TOBS? 😉
What a pair!
Ray Pierre and Naomi!
If a rock was present they could claim the intelligence of a rock in the group.
And if you only looked at the clock at 2:43, you’d have yourself a nice trend. A cherry-flavored one. People might even pay you for it. Just make them forget about the cycle between the 2:43s.
I predict you can get lots of funding if you suggest that your predictions will lead to the destruction of mankind. It worked for Ehrlich and he wasn’t even right once on any given day. 🙂
What happens if the clock stops?
Then the clock is still correct twice A day, like the IPCC.
LOL…..:)
Where’s the link to the Clock model
Naomi Oreskes’ observation that: “climate scientists are so busy talking about stuff they don’t understand
Did I cut and paste that Oreskes quote correctly?