Skeptics keep saying things that are contrary to what we believe, so we must silence them in order to allow an honest debate.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Recent Comments
DD More on Making The Data Better saveenergy on Ozone Hole To Destroy Entire L… saveenergy on Outdated Books Bob Greene on Organic Gardener Worried About… saveenergy on Paid To Produce Gibberish saveenergy on The End Of Snow In Wales Morgan Wright on ““verging on climate den… Bob Greene on ““verging on climate den… Morgan Wright on Captain Kirk Says CO2 Will Kil… saveenergy on Freezing Canada
“Honesty is the best policy – when there is money in it.”
Mark Twain
How do you get climate scientists to predict the next 30 years?
.
.
.
.
Give them half a century and they will get back to you.
Reblogged this on Gds44's Blog.
“To punish the oppressors of humanity is clemency; to forgive them is cruelty.”
– Maximilien Robespierre
Silencing skeptics for an honesty debate is the same as having to vote in an election which happens to only be a one party state.
I would prefer it if we silenced them. And you know we are better than half way to doing that.
Think about it. That spineless worm Michael Mann, terrified to speak in public (I don’t count the antiseptic world of university symposiums – that’s not public). Looking over his shoulder, afraid Mark Morano (or anyone half way competent) will be there. Won’t even dare a spot on CNN.
Jimmy Hansen so bat shit crazy even Governor Moonbeam can’t risk him for fear of him opening his mouth.
Steve Schneider (the only one of them who had any balls) taking a dirt nap, expired while “polluting the atmosphere” on a 747 to London. Hypocrite to the end.
I like our chances. I like the people in the trench next to me. Let’s get em.
Join the Union of Concerned Scientists, and you too can become part of the movement to rat on such folk to the media! “Silencing global warming critics” http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2010/08/silencing_global_warming_criti.html