h/t to sabretoothed
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Recent Comments
Jeff L. on Analyzing The Western Water Cr… Morgan Wright on Great Lakes Approaching 100% I… Morgan Wright on Great Lakes Set Another Spring… gelcarrion0t on New Visitech Features saveenergy on Ice-Free Arctic By 2014 gelcarrion0t on Ice-Free Arctic By 2014 gelcarrion0t on Debt-Free US Treasury Forecast gelcarrion0t on Seventeen Years Of Fun Barbara Stockwell on Nuclear Safety In The US saveenergy on 100% Tariffs On Chinese EV…
So? If Einstein had a son who turned out to be a Nazi sympathizer it wouldn’t make what Einstein said any less true.
Evolution is a fact. Do you deny this?
Instead of being a paranoid moron, why not go to the search bar and see what I have written about darwin?
Wow. You have an over-active imagination.
Evolution is a fact? Last time I checked, it’s still a theory with some gaps…
Why don’t you explain a huge difference in Y chromosome between higher primate and homo sapien while there is very little difference in X chromosome? Sons of God and daughters of Earth? 😉
Since this is about Darwin’s son over eugenic, not evolution, stick to the topic…
Speaking of eugenic, Margaret Sanger, the founding of Planned Parenthood, promoted eugenic… http://www.dianedew.com/sanger.htm
“Evolution is a fact?”
The fact of evolution is a fact. The theory of evolution describes the fact. The theory may be wrong, but the fact remains.
Consider gravity: the fact of gravity is the falling apple. Newton’s theory described that fact. Neton’s theory was wrong in so much as it breaks down for objects moving near the speed of light and for tiny objects. (It’s stillgood for everyday use.)
So, what’s the fact of evolution? Evolution is “descent with modification”. Descent is an obvious fact: we are born. Modification is readily apparent if you look at humans of different races.
That we are all humans means we must have common descent, yet we have obvious racial differences: we are modified.
So, descent is a fact and modification is a fact. From those two facts evolution must inevitably follow.
QED.
Lefties get really defensive when the more unsavory aspects of the philosophical foundation of their idealogy are pointed out. Why wouldn’t they?
When I get into an argument with a leftard warmist in some comment section on the internet I just know if I keep them talking long enough they’ll invariably spew forth with their malthusian anti-(other) human rhetoric.
Wow. That’s the first time I’ve heard about Darwin’s son. Interesting!
I wonder what he meant by “eugenic reforms” and “civilization”.
Master Race! The ultimate answer to Earth’s problems.
In reality it would multiply Earth’s problems rather than reduce, as each group will fight for their version of the “Perfect Human”, resulting in total chaos.
I think the actual implementation was to exterminate or ‘phase out’ through sterilization, undesirable human characteristics indicating inferiority. The criteria being such things as eye, hair and skin colour…
My point is that, sfaics, there’s no such thing as civil eugenics.
The holocaust is an historical fact, was instituted by Nazis, was based on eugenics – the perfection of the human race by experimentation and the anihilation of a selection of ‘other’ humans, – and it was an abomination.
Eugenics was the pseudo-scientific justification for actioning a particular idealogical/political/social prejudice. It had been in those societies for centuries before anyone knew what eugenics was.
And the sick thinking continues on with organisations like The Club of Rome. ‘The World has a Cancer and the Cancer is Man’, Mankind at the Turning Point, 1974.
Consensus http://select.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=F60E1EFD345A13738DDDA80A94D0405B828FF1D3
Paywalled.