http://climateprogress.org/2011/02/21/accuweather-joe-bastardi-resigns/
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Recent Comments
Chris Barron on Climate Scientists Conversing John Williams on Prayers For Caesar Kent Clizbe on Scientific American Wants To… Morgan Wright on Scientific American Wants To… TimC on Please Enter The Boxcar Peacef… Disillusioned on Forecasting Climate Change Walter on 4-9 Degrees Warming At The Gre… Bob Greene on Dangerous Assault Rifle Morgan Wright on Scientists Are Alarmed vuurklip on Government To Save Us From Glo…
I would go to Climate Progress but it would count as a “hit” on the website and I cannot, in good conscience, do that.
ditto, what Chuck said
Sorry guys, I can’t help but check out the dark side from time to time. It’s strange how so many comments equate Fox news with the skeptic community.
Yes I agree with you suyts, It’s a bad idea to have only one side heard even if it is the dark side, Patients you must have (in my best Yoda voice).
(Too many YODA phrases… Must resist.. Aghhhaa..)
It’s strange how so many comments equate Fox news with the skeptic community.
Global warming: thinking not required.
“not thinking” required
Let us know when your comment is no longer awaiting moderation, Steve!
HAHAAHAHAHAHA, let me know if that gets past moderation.
Playing Climate games
http://scienceandpublicpolicy.org/images/stories/papers/originals/playing_climate_games.pdf
suyts says:
February 22, 2011 at 6:06 pm
“HAHAAHAHAHAHA, let me know if that gets past moderation”.
Why do you think he published his question at his own blog.
Great move Steven Goddard.
I read that article and I have to agree with a point he made! which was that Joe Bastardi is a Long Range and Expert Meteorologist.
warmists strike again!
robert honeycutt from skepticalscience.com, the person who some days ago was proved to suffer from google scholar illiteracy by popular technology, spent whole 2 hours studying the report. his conclusion is that the last chapter of the report somehow leads the conclusion of csi into a reversed direction… which i fail to see how.
“According to the IPCC Fourth Assessment Report (6), the future changes in the extratropical circulation are likely to be characterized by increases in the positive phases of the AO (referred to as the Northern Annular Mode (NAM) in the report) over the 21st century as the climate warms. The AO is closely related to the NAO in the Atlantic sector, so we infer that a positive trend in the NAO index would also occur. Therefore, we conclude that the 2009-‐2010 blocked, negative phase NAO is an extreme event that is not consistent with the overall upward trend in the NAO index since 1950, and is opposite to the current understanding of projected future change in the NAO.”
any ideas, steven?