Mindblowing Fraud From Gavin And Tom In Victoria

ScreenHunter_10531 Sep. 29 04.26 

Wilsons Promonotory is the southernmost point in Victoria. Satellites show that there has been no warming there since the start of records in 1978.

ScreenHunter_10532 Sep. 29 04.27


As of 2012, GISS showed no warming since the start of records in 1880.

station (9)

Data.GISS: GISS Surface Temperature Analysis

But since 2012, Gavin and Tom have added a spectacular hockey stick of post 1978 (satellite era) warming.

station (10)

Data.GISS: GISS Surface Temperature Analysis

The animation below shows their spectacularly fraudulent manipulations of the surface temperature data at Wilson’s Promontory.


This warming does not exist. The fraudsters at NASA and NOAA simply made it up.

About Tony Heller

Just having fun
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

14 Responses to Mindblowing Fraud From Gavin And Tom In Victoria

  1. ozspeaksup says:

    and this week in Aus?
    we have a mongrel bragging he got the enquiry into BoM fraud stymied.
    christopher pyne
    then they remove Maurice Newman

    Maurice Newman dumped.

    and then THE TOPPER
    this 2faced lying POS! who backstabbed Tony Abbot and is so smug has…
    done this
    sold Aus off to the fn eu scum!

  2. Andy DC says:

    Why all the missing data in the temperature record? Here in the 21st Century, with global warming supposedly the worst problem facing humanity, we can’t maintain a constant temperauture record in a supposedly modern country?

    But then we are told that satellite data is no good either. Something stinks to high heaven. Only “climate scientists” with red and brown crayons are allowed to give us great unwashed the real truth. And that “real truth” somehow always fits their hockey stick and multibillion dollar global warming scam. How convenient!

    • DD More says:

      And where did they find the missing readings between 2012 & 2015 and only to lose some back in the 1960’s & 1970’s?

  3. sfx2020 says:

    Where is that sat data you show from? As in, can anyone check it?

  4. It is certainly the biggest racket ever and it’s about time the police were called in to stop it.

  5. Climatism says:

    Reblogged this on Climatism and commented:
    U N B E L I E V A B L E.

    Though 110% understandable when you have a global warming agenda to prosecute.

    And then they name-call anyone sceptical of this data manipulation, as “deniers” of science !?

  6. bit chilly says:

    tony,do you ever send any of your stuff to official government department and ask for a response. here in the uk our local member of parliament is obliged to ask questions on their constituents behalf and are required to provide answers.

  7. Andy Oz says:

    Attached is a link to a recent paper issued by the BOM on its capabilities and asking for funding.

    While overall staffing is fairy constant, the skills have diminished, as the remote observation staff has halved since 1990.

    “The Bureau employs around 500 staff who are in roles classified as meteorologists. However, many of these roles are filled by staff with professional qualifications other than meteorology and cannot perform the duties of an operational meteorologist. An operational meteorologist is defined as a person who has successfully completed the Graduate Diploma of Meteorology”

    Warning Bells anyone??

    And they wonder why their data adjustments have been called into question.


    • Andy Oz says:

      If Engineering companies tried this and something failed, there would be hell to pay.
      What does the BOM get after they’ve been busted data tampering? A government coverup.

      • Gail Combs says:

        That is why most of the staff at BOM is now bureaucrats and not operational meteorologists.

      • Gail Combs says:

        The problem with constant government cover=ups is eventually you provoke Defenestration:



        “A rendition of the Defenestration of Prague. The manure pile is not featured.”

        …A Broken Deal & a Soft Landing

        Needless to say, the Bohemian nobles were outraged. They drew up a petition as quickly as they could, condemning Ferdinand for violating the terms of their original agreement. When the collective of nobles arrived at Prague to deliver the petition to the king, they found that Ferdinand was not there. Instead they came across two of his Catholic advisors, whom they attempted to give the petition. We can only surmise that the advisors’ answers were less than well-received, for the next thing we know, those same two advisors were hurled from the third floor window of the tower. The Bohemian nobles then declared that Ferdinand was no longer their legitimate king.

        Luckily for the advisors, they met a soft landing – a pile of manure. That, at least, was the Protestant account of why the men survived, one which effectively adds insult to injury…..

        Segue: The Powder Keg’s Lit

        While the circumstances of the defenestration sometimes seem a little silly, if not farcical, the consequences of it were nothing of the sort. The escalation in hostilities and bloodshed that followed would leave extremely deep scars throughout the villages, towns and cities of Europe for the next three decades, and well beyond…..

Leave a Reply