Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Climate Desperation
- Artificial Stupidity
- Climate Obsession
- The Climate Empire Strikes Back
- Climate Scam Parrots
- “I’ve dealt with him before ”
- “I’ve dealt with him before.”
- “BE HONEST”
- Turn Out The Lights – The Party’s Over
- Net Zero In The UK
- Turn Out The Lights, The Party Is Over
- Michael Mann Again
- Over The Target
- Michael Mann’s Latest Research
- “an amazing documentary dismantling the climate change theory”
- The World’s Greatest Climate Scientist Speaks Out
- Startling New Revelation
- Just An Illusion
- Climate Conditioning
- Fact Checking Reuters
- No Correlation
- I Offended Their Religion
- The High Priest Has Forbidden Questioning His Religion
- Hiding And Rewriting History
- 97% Of Scientists Agree
Email Subscription
Join 1,943 other subscribersRecent Comments
Enhanced Background Checks
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.
They are not responsible enough to own a gun and they aren’t responsible enough to tell me how to live my life; but that doesn’t stop them from trying.
True that.
What a great bumper sticker on a large bumper this would be..
Let’s ‘Hope’ that certain lunatics would either never try to obtain a firearm, or be denied the right.
🙂
love it!! Sent a copy to my buddy who used to own a gun shop.
I think that people on the left realize that people on the left can’t be trusted with guns. They just expect that the rest of us are as screwed up as they are and want to “keep us safe from ourselves”.
In regard to enhanced background checks; I believe if The People performed a background check on members of the Senate, Congress and Representatives they would be shocked how many have dual citizenships and what the countries they share citizenships with.
How about we start with drug testing politicians.
Gator,
I found the quote from Hope that she was part of the Lipshit fraud:
I wonder if Ranger might want to be informed. Since she is still trying to tar them with Lipshit’s fraud.
If somebody on the Internet is tarring and feathering a company with false information, they’d want to know. . When slander hurts a person or company’s income, I believe that’s when it becomes libelous slander. Whether the accuser says they’re in the right to do so is of no consequence. Lots of zealots have been silenced by their own stupidity.