All The Lies That Are Unfit To Print

From The New York Pravda :

Most Americans think global warming poses a critical threat

ScreenHunter_6679 Feb. 02 07.07 ScreenHunter_6685 Feb. 02 07.44

Global Warming: What Should Be Done? – NYTimes.com

Americans just elected a Congress full of climate skeptics, despite Tom Steyer’s $100 million fear-mongering campaign. They couldn’t care less about this scam.

 

ScreenHunter_6681 Feb. 02 07.18

The Anti-Science Climate Denier Caucus: 114th Congress Edition | ThinkProgress

The Earth’s temperature hasn’t changed for almost 20 years, despite a sharp increase in CO2.

ScreenHunter_6677 Feb. 02 07.04

The New York Times is pushing this propaganda because the White House wants to put pressure on Congressional Democrats to stay in line with Obama’s Keystone veto, which is intended to protect Warren Buffet’s multi-billion dollar business transporting Canadian oil by rail.

ScreenHunter_6682 Feb. 02 07.27

The New York Times is lying about the climate. They are lying about people’s opinions about the climate. They censor any opinions which impact their propaganda. What a pathetic excuse for a newspaper.

ScreenHunter_6684 Feb. 02 07.33

About Tony Heller

Just having fun
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

12 Responses to All The Lies That Are Unfit To Print

  1. emsnews says:

    The poll wasn’t taken in upstate NY, that is certain. It rarely is above 10 degrees F at night this winter, often below 0. Coldest winter in the last 40 years for me. Yet another blizzard today, -17º F at night this week!

  2. We should also try to ask:

    As you may have heard, attacks on American ideals and liberties are thought to be the work of hostile infiltrators in U.S. businesses. Should the federal government limit the amount of hostile anti-American propaganda that U.S. businesses put out?

    Stupid questions invite stupid responses.

  3. omanuel says:

    Our 2001 papers on the Sun were

    A.. Excluded from Proceedings of the

    1. Conference on Asteroids at Palermo, Italy (Sicily) where Galileo had taught.

    http://www.astropa.unipa.it/Asteroids2001/index1.html

    2. SOHO-ACE Workshop 2001 on Solar and Galactic Composition, in Bern, Switzerland

    http://www.worldcat.org/title/solar-and-galactic-composition-a-joint-sohoace-workshop-bern-switzerland-6-9-march-2001/oclc/49519037

    (The editor, Robert F. Wimmer-Schweingruber, inserted a section in the Proceedings claiming that an iron-rich solar interior was impossible, but I was not allowed to publish the experimental data showing the Sun and other ordinary stars generate and discard hydrogen to interstellar space instead of interstellar clouds of hydrogen forming stars that act as H-fusion reactors).

    B. Included

    1. As Abstract 56.09 in the 197th Meeting of the American Astronomical Society, San Diego, CA January 7-11, 2001.

    2. As Expanded Abstract 1041in Proceedings of the 32nd Lunar and Planetary Science Conference, March 12-16, 2001, http://www.omatumr.com/lpsc.prn.pdf

  4. John B., M.D. says:

    All the poll proves is the alarmists are winning the messaging battle – with lies told by a media with an agenda.

    • Gail Combs says:

      All it proves is you can LIE with statistics. That poll is useless. Remember NYT readers are low information Progressives.

      Try Breitbart or the New York Post readers and you get an entirely different view.

      From the latest Rasmussen Poll
      Global Warming is Primarily Caused By…

      Human activity Planetary Trends Other Reason
      December 2014
      42% ……………….. 42% ……………………. 7%
      October 2014
      47% ………………. 37% ……………………. 6%
      http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/current_events/environment_energy/environment_update

      NY Post: http://nypost.com/tag/global-warming/

      Steve Goddard even made it on NY Post!
      Global-warming skeptic says government manipulated temperature data

      Another decent article The Lessons of Climate Change Past

      ….And if climate Cassandras are as conscientious as they claim to be about weighing evidence, how do they accommodate historical evidence of enormously consequential episodes of climate change not produced by human activity?

      Before wagering vast wealth and curtailments of liberty on correcting the climate, two recent books should be considered.

      In “The Third Horseman: Climate Change and the Great Famine of the 14th Century,” William Rosen explains how Europe’s “most widespread and destructive famine” was the result of “an almost incomprehensibly complicated mixture of climate, commerce and conflict, four centuries in gestation.”….

      In “Global Crisis: War, Climate Change & Catastrophe in the Seventeenth Century,” Geoffrey Parker, a history professor at Ohio State, explains how a “fatal synergy” between climatological and political factors produced turmoil from Europe to China…

      Whatever caused the LIA — decreased sunspot activity and increased seismic activity were important factors — it caused, among other horrific things, “stunting” that, Parker says, “reduced the average height of those born in 1675, the ‘year without a summer,’ or during the years of cold and famine in the early 1690s, to only 63 inches: the lowest ever recorded.”…

      Neither book, however, supports those who believe human behavior is the sovereign or even primary disrupter of climate normality, whatever that might be.

      With the hands that today’s climate Cassandras are not using to pat themselves on the back for their virtuous empiricism, they should pick up such books.

      • inMAGICn says:

        Just look at how the question is framed. It is a standard SciFi theme: “If this continues…”
        Fiction follows.

  5. John Silver says:

    Der Völkischer Times.

  6. rah says:

    The weather in the NYC area looked on heck of a lot worse than that to me when I drove by just north of the city (I-95 S to I-287) Monday afternoon this week. I wouldn’t use the NYT, LAT, or Boston Globe for bird cage liners for a bird I liked. They are fine for a poop pad or fire starter though.

  7. Beale says:

    What’s with South Dakota? Doesn’t it have “climate deniers”?

Leave a Reply