Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- El Nino To The Rescue?
- Worst March Drought On Record
- ChartGL Process Control Demo
- The Biggest Money Laundering Scam
- Drought In The Headwaters Of Lake Powell
- Unrealistic Expectations Of Water Availibility
- Did Bill Gates Do This?
- Worst March Drought On Record In The US
- The Real Hockey Stick Graph
- Analyzing The Western Water Crisis
- Gaslighting 1924
- Climate Abstract Generator
- Climate Abstract Generator
- “Why Do You Resist?”
- Climate Attribution Model
- Fact Checking NASA
- Fact Checking Grok
- Fact Checking The New York Times
- New Visitech Features
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2014
- Debt-Free US Treasury Forecast
- Analyzing Big City Crime (Part 2)
- Analyzing Big City Crime
- UK Migration Caused By Global Warming
- Climate Attribution In Greece
Email Subscription
Join 1,944 other subscribersRecent Comments
Jeff L. on Analyzing The Western Water Cr… Morgan Wright on Great Lakes Approaching 100% I… Morgan Wright on Great Lakes Set Another Spring… gelcarrion0t on New Visitech Features saveenergy on Ice-Free Arctic By 2014 gelcarrion0t on Ice-Free Arctic By 2014 gelcarrion0t on Debt-Free US Treasury Forecast gelcarrion0t on Seventeen Years Of Fun Barbara Stockwell on Nuclear Safety In The US saveenergy on 100% Tariffs On Chinese EV…
President Obama Explains Why He Is Pushing The Global Warming Scam
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Reblogged this on CLINGERS… BLOGGING BAD ~ DICK.G: AMERICAN !.
University of Melbourne confirms there is no science in Climate Research.
It’s all about public policy.
http://m.theaustralian.com.au/business/latest/henry-in-switch-to-university-climate-role/story-e6frg90f-1226905511227
The following organizations provide evidence that:
1) Global Warming / Climate Change is real.
2) Human activities are by far the largest causative agent.
3) Global Warming / Climate Change is a continuing, ongoing phenomenon.
American Meteorological Society
“It is clear from extensive scientific evidence that the dominant cause of the rapid change in climate of the past half century is human-induced increases in the amount of atmospheric greenhouse gases, including carbon dioxide (CO2)”
http://www.ametsoc.org/policy/2012climatechange.html
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
“Report: Human activity fuels global warming”
http://web.mit.edu/newsoffice/2007/climate.html
California Institute of Technology
“How We Know Global Warming is Real”
“The science behind human-induced climate change”
http://www.gps.caltech.edu/~tapio/papers/skeptic_2008.pdf
Stanford University
“A large body of scientific information indicates that global climate change is unequivocal, almost certainly is caused mostly by human activities, is already causing significant harm, and as it continues, holds great risks for our future.”
https://pangea.stanford.edu/programs/outreach/climatechange/
Columbia University
“The Greenhouse Effect and Global Warming”
“With higher CO2 concentrations come expectations of a stronger greenhouse effect and therefore warmer global temperatures.”
http://www.columbia.edu/~vjd1/greenhouse.htm
You’re kidding right?
You know just say those things to get grant money surely?
Have human activities ‘fuelled’ the last 17+ years of no global warming?
“It’s already causing significant harm..” Really? Where? Or did the “harm” stop 17 years ago and we just missed it?
Bill,
argumentum ab auctoritate
Google it.
If the earth was a greenhouse there would be no life on this planet genius. Gaia emits 95 % of Co2, surely we must kill her to save her ? Moron alert……
I’ll go with #4 Bill – as follows:
4) Global Chese / Climate Cheese – good on crackers, on pizza, and my all time fave the philadelphia cheese steak
The only thing missing are the actual effects. Pity that.
Don’t you just love it. They always open with “neglecting the facts” then neglect to bring any.
I suspect he is already regretting that one. Right up there with the Hillary one.
MIT ISN’T as convinced about AGW as you are….. http://www.examiner.com/article/carbon-dioxide-irrelevant-climate-debate-says-mit-scientist