Current climate experts simply forgot to mention that WAIS thinning has been going on for centuries, and has nothing to do with CO2.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- New Video : Analyzing Oil And Gas
- Is Antarctica Melting?
- High Speed Analysis And Visualization
- El Nino To The Rescue?
- Fake News Update
- Growth Of Antarctic Sea Ice
- 65 Years Of Progress!
- El Nino To The Rescue?
- Worst March Drought On Record
- ChartGL Process Control Demo
- The Biggest Money Laundering Scam
- Drought In The Headwaters Of Lake Powell
- Unrealistic Expectations Of Water Availibility
- Did Bill Gates Do This?
- Worst March Drought On Record In The US
- The Real Hockey Stick Graph
- Analyzing The Western Water Crisis
- Gaslighting 1924
- Climate Abstract Generator
- Climate Abstract Generator
- “Why Do You Resist?”
- Climate Attribution Model
- Fact Checking NASA
- Fact Checking Grok
Email Subscription
Join 1,948 other subscribersRecent Comments
gelcarrion0t on New Video : Analyzing Oil And… saveenergy on Is Antarctica Melting? saveenergy on 65 Years Of Progress! Jeff L. on Analyzing The Western Water Cr… Morgan Wright on Great Lakes Approaching 100% I… Morgan Wright on Great Lakes Set Another Spring… gelcarrion0t on New Visitech Features saveenergy on Ice-Free Arctic By 2014 gelcarrion0t on Ice-Free Arctic By 2014 gelcarrion0t on Debt-Free US Treasury Forecast


There is also this.
Copy of original report by Dodson. 1948.
See Page 8 for Deglaciation. Please note the term “geologically speaking”!
http://docs.lib.noaa.gov/rescue/IPY/ipy_12_pdf/QC851R66no6.pdf
“As the upper limit of glaciation was not found it is obvious that a short time ago geologically speaking the ice was more than 600 ft. thick ten miles off shore. When due allowance for the gradient of the glacier is made it seems certain that the ice was at that time a 1000 ft. thicker on the mainland than at present.”
Anyone who says that the Antarctic glaciers are getting thinner due to CO2 and CAGW has absolutely no idea what they are talking about. The irony is that NOAA say this and yet have the scientific evidence of the opposite in their library.
Excellent find!