Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Climate Desperation
- Artificial Stupidity
- Climate Obsession
- The Climate Empire Strikes Back
- Climate Scam Parrots
- “I’ve dealt with him before ”
- “I’ve dealt with him before.”
- “BE HONEST”
- Turn Out The Lights – The Party’s Over
- Net Zero In The UK
- Turn Out The Lights, The Party Is Over
- Michael Mann Again
- Over The Target
- Michael Mann’s Latest Research
- “an amazing documentary dismantling the climate change theory”
- The World’s Greatest Climate Scientist Speaks Out
- Startling New Revelation
- Just An Illusion
- Climate Conditioning
- Fact Checking Reuters
- No Correlation
- I Offended Their Religion
- The High Priest Has Forbidden Questioning His Religion
- Hiding And Rewriting History
- 97% Of Scientists Agree
Email Subscription
Join 1,943 other subscribersRecent Comments
First Annual Blowtorch Reunion?
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.
Now, there’s a coffee/screen interface quote!
Oooo … Reggie is going to be pissed at you 😉
Nah, Reggie is a stoic who suffers in dignity.
It’s the climate prophessor I’m worried about. He is the manic type who could slide into depression.
Turney is still stuck in Antarctic with his journo mates writing more doom stories.
Meanwhile the Russian icebreaker is back in NZ. 😀
http://m.smh.com.au/environment/climate-change/humble-hut-plays-key-role-in-climate-change-research-20140114-30t2u.html
More from the “We’re all Doomed! brigade.
http://www.abc.net.au/science/articles/2014/01/13/3924653.htm
The autobot PR campaign is in full swing.
Reunion Time and Place has been booked!!!
Be there!!
http://www.nature.com/natureevents/science/events/22965-Arctic_Sea_Ice_Reduction_The_Evidence_Models_and_Global_Impact
Oh, to be a little mouse in the corner for that one!
The alarmists always point to anecdotal evidence or try to create their own anecdotal evidence to “prove” warming. But if we point out anecdotal evidence or they fail in their attempt to create it, that is never scientifically valid.