How do you debate people with fully addled brains?
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Recent Comments
Jeff L. on Analyzing The Western Water Cr… Morgan Wright on Great Lakes Approaching 100% I… Morgan Wright on Great Lakes Set Another Spring… gelcarrion0t on New Visitech Features saveenergy on Ice-Free Arctic By 2014 gelcarrion0t on Ice-Free Arctic By 2014 gelcarrion0t on Debt-Free US Treasury Forecast gelcarrion0t on Seventeen Years Of Fun Barbara Stockwell on Nuclear Safety In The US saveenergy on 100% Tariffs On Chinese EV…
Good gravy.
“How do you debate people with fully addled brains?”
By inhaling a similar quantity of medication.
“The point”
\
/
\
/
\
[williamch’s head]
“To be charitable, maybe stevengoddard is pointing out that people have been saying that the sky is falling for a long time. I learned about it in secondary school, it was called science fiction”
Another science settler found his Goldilocks Zone.
More than a century ago it was demonstrated that the mythical “greenhouse effect” does not work on greenhouses. There has never been any evidence that it works on planets either. Teaching silly nonsense to school students is another reason that children would be better off and have learned more if th schools were just burned down.
He is not addled. Deluded, but not addled. He is a Leftist with a hate on for critics of the “consensus”, because that is his gang and their dogma, and he only “debates” to spout derogatory comments about the “foe” (that’s you, in this case, Steven). The only way you can win a “debate” with him is if the “debate” is set up as a very hard contact sport (with maybe an octagon around it…you know), where he doesn’t get to judge when or if you score a definitive hit on him, but must suffer the hit as a hard fact, immediately and intimately. Debating on the internet is like using a waterwheel to power your bicycle–in a word, ineffective (in two words: obviously ineffective).